Teams

MCAC:Eagan'sLadiesoftheStrings:Eagan

2025 Cape Tri-Level 18 & Over Women: Summer · 3.0 Women 1

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-25vs MCAC:SiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Eagan / Amita Bhatt vs Lisa-Holly Flaherty / Judith Andrews6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs MCAC:Silva:FoxWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenate Reithmayr / Laine Kotoski vs Bianca Silva / STEFANIE FOX7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-11vs MCAC:HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudith Jamieson / Laine Kotoski vs Linda Blood / Lois Riley6-2, 6-3
2025-06-04vs WIL:StillwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Eagan / Renate Reithmayr vs Barbara Penn / Carolyn Hutchings6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-21vs MCAC:SiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalia Lassor / Laine Kotoski vs Susan Jannitto / Meredith Oram3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-14vs MCAC:Silva:FoxLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmita Bhatt / Laine Kotoski vs Carolyn Watts / Ruth Cohen3-6, 5-7
2025-05-07vs MCAC:HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenate Reithmayr / Natalia Lassor vs Lois Riley / Carol Rawlins3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-30vs WIL:StillwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenate Reithmayr / Peggy Eagan vs Lisa Phillips / Laurie Stillwell5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amita Bhatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Antonia Kenny
published 3
Judith Jamieson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laine Kotoski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalia Lassor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Eagan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Renate Reithmayr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Jamieson + Peggy Eagan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amita Bhatt
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Antonia Kenny
19W–39L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judith Jamieson
15W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laine Kotoski
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalia Lassor
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Eagan
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renate Reithmayr
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.