Teams

MCAC:Sia

2025 Cape Tri-Level 18 & Over Women: Summer · 3.0 Women 1

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesLisa-Holly Flaherty / Judith Andrews vs Peggy Eagan / Amita Bhatt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-12vs MCAC:Silva:FoxLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Sia / Elizabeth Beckhardt vs Bianca Silva / STEFANIE FOX6-3, 4-5, 0-1
2025-06-11vs WIL:StillwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudith Andrews / Lisa-Holly Flaherty vs Laurie Stillwell / Lisa Phillips2-6, 3-6
2025-05-28vs MCAC:HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Sia / Elizabeth Beckhardt vs Dawn Hall / Sarah Toadvine2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Jannitto / Meredith Oram vs Natalia Lassor / Laine Kotoski6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-07vs WIL:StillwellWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Beckhardt / Meredith Oram vs Carolyn Hutchings / Lisa Phillips6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-30vs MCAC:Silva:FoxWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Jannitto / Meredith Oram vs Bianca Silva / STEFANIE FOX2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-23vs MCAC:HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa-Holly Flaherty / Judith Andrews vs Carol Rawlins / Nancy Dexter1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Elizabeth Beckhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Cindy Sia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Meredith Oram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Lisa-Holly Flaherty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Judith Andrews
published
Susan Jannitto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Sia + Susan Jannitto5162% games+6.4% vs expected
Cindy Sia + Elizabeth Beckhardt5947% games+4.2% vs expected
Meredith Oram + Susan Jannitto5057% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Beckhardt
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Cindy Sia
32W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Meredith Oram
37W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Lisa-Holly Flaherty
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Judith Andrews
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Jannitto
14W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.