Teams

CACM ORANGE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-16vs LTFC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesPaul Jaszewski / Adam Smith vs Rich Nipert / Vance Wagenknecht4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDirk McDermott vs Tom van Denover6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Berglund / Kendall Lin vs Sean Raftery / Thomas Samuelson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Wylie / Ty Bartels vs Todd Berich / Greg Brooks1-6, 4-6
2025-07-09vs SS-H GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesDirk McDermott / John Feldman vs Sean Hudelson / David Arons6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKendall Lin vs John Agin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHervey Pierre / Paul Barrow vs William Hathaway / Todd Chancey6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrian Berglund / Ty Bartels vs Kevin Geiss / Frank Coria6-0, 6-4
2025-07-02vs GAC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesHervey Pierre / Craig Stromberg vs Marcus McAskin / Shawn Harrison6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohn Wharton vs David Longcope3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Feldman / Dirk McDermott vs David Hipshman / Brandon Paxton4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Jaszewski / Adam Smith vs Michael Runda / Thomas Forti6-3, 6-3
2025-06-25vs EM REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesPaul Jaszewski / Kevin Ray vs John Esbenshade / David Ekedahl2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Wharton vs Paul Barben7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Barrow / Adam Smith vs Thomas Toth / Joe Mahoney3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Berglund / Kendall Lin vs Hayes Trotter / David May6-4, 6-1
2025-06-18vs SKY BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesPaul Barrow / Craig Stromberg vs Bob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Wharton vs Gregory Tamkin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Jaszewski / Adam Smith vs Kendrick McLish / Rockwell Pearson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTy Bartels / Scott Bice vs Blake Johnson / Greg Rogers4-6, 3-6
2025-06-11vs DTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesCraig Stromberg / Hervey Pierre vs David Turner / Curtis Turner7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJohn Wharton vs Hunter Hook6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Ray / Paul Jaszewski vs Paul Suter / David Fawley6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrian Wylie / Brian Berglund vs William Nelson / Kent Shimek3-6, 6-7
2025-06-04vs CACM REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesHervey Pierre / Paul Barrow vs Jason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Wharton vs Jonathan Bach6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Smith / Paul Jaszewski vs Jimmie Rose / Randal Ankeney6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Wylie / Kendall Lin vs Ali Barghelame / Daniel Chin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
John Wharton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.91
Brian Berglund
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Hervey Pierre
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Dirk McDermott
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Paul Jaszewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Craig Stromberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Kendall Lin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Adam Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Scott Bice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Paul Barrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Kevin Ray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
John Feldman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Ty Bartels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hervey Pierre + Paul Barrow6073% games+16.0% vs expected
John Feldman + Dirk McDermott9166% games+10.3% vs expected
Kendall Lin + Craig Stromberg5353% games+7.6% vs expected
Adam Smith + Paul Jaszewski8261% games+4.5% vs expected
Hervey Pierre + Craig Stromberg6258% games+4.4% vs expected
Adam Smith + Craig Stromberg12554% games−1.2% vs expected
Paul Jaszewski + Dirk McDermott4258% gamesnot enough data
Kendall Lin + Brian Berglund224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Wharton
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Brian Berglund
154W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Hervey Pierre
84W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Dirk McDermott
150W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Paul Jaszewski
33W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Craig Stromberg
87W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Kendall Lin
41W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Adam Smith
116W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Scott Bice
24W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Paul Barrow
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kevin Ray
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
John Feldman
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Ty Bartels
3W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.