Teams

SKY BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-16vs EM REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas vs Gregory Fritsch / John Esbenshade7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGary Williams vs Paul Barben6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBlake Johnson / Jody Wright vs Thomas Toth / Ryan Gray3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Tamkin / Rockwell Pearson vs Daniel Moe / David May6-2, 6-1
2025-07-09vs DTC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas vs David Turner / Gary Friedman6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKendrick McLish / Doug Wiley vs David Fawley / Paul Suter6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRockwell Pearson / Gregory Tamkin vs Stephen Olsen / Jeff Barton4-6, 4-6
2025-07-02vs LTFC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Rockwell Pearson vs Thomas Samuelson / Simon Payne6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGary Williams vs Jeff Johnson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDoug Wiley / Blake Johnson vs Rich Nipert / Joe Pascucci6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBob Sullivan / Conn Flanigan vs Greg Brooks / Stephen Houy4-6, 4-6
2025-06-25vs GAC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesKendrick McLish / Greg Rogers vs Thomas Forti / Mark Nothaft6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesGary Williams vs Stephen Parmentier3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRockwell Pearson / Doug Wiley vs Mark Arlen / David Longcope4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJody Wright / Gregory Tamkin vs Brandon Paxton / Barry Gleichenhaus6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-21vs SS-H GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Kendrick McLish vs Alan Gillespie / Daniel Greer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGary Williams vs Adam Woodworth6-4, 1-1
W#2 DoublesConn Flanigan / Rockwell Pearson vs Todd Chancey / Sean Hudelson6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Jody Wright vs Frank Coria / Kevin Geiss3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-18vs CACM ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas vs Paul Barrow / Craig Stromberg3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Tamkin vs John Wharton1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKendrick McLish / Rockwell Pearson vs Paul Jaszewski / Adam Smith1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBlake Johnson / Greg Rogers vs Ty Bartels / Scott Bice6-4, 6-3
2025-06-11vs CACM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas vs Jason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDoug Wiley vs Jonathan Malinzak7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Rogers / Blake Johnson vs Michael Nobles / James Parker4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesConn Flanigan / Rockwell Pearson vs Randal Ankeney / BRIAN ROSENTHAL6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Doug Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.80
Kendrick McLish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Rockwell Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.70
Bob Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.70
Gary Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Greg Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.64
Jeremy Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.64
Conn Flanigan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Jody Wright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Sullivan + Kendrick McLish6156% games+11.7% vs expected
Bob Sullivan + Doug Wiley6352% games+2.8% vs expected
Bob Sullivan + Jeremy Thomas4550% games+0.2% vs expected
Kendrick McLish + Jeremy Thomas4453% games−1.3% vs expected
Rockwell Pearson + Conn Flanigan3253% games−3.8% vs expected
Jody Wright + Gregory Tamkin314 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Thomas + Rockwell Pearson314 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Tamkin + Conn Flanigan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doug Wiley
62W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Kendrick McLish
67W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Rockwell Pearson
15W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bob Sullivan
21W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Gary Williams
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Greg Rogers
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
13W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Jeremy Thomas
16W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Conn Flanigan
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jody Wright
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.