Teams

CACM RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-16vs SS-H GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Parker / Michael Nobles vs Todd Chancey / David Arons7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJonathan Bach vs John Agin6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Jimmie Rose vs Frank Coria / Kevin Geiss6-3, 6-1
2025-07-09vs EM REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAli Barghelame / Jimmie Rose vs Joe Mahoney / Gregory Fritsch3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJonathan Malinzak vs David Ekedahl6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBRIAN ROSENTHAL / Jason Wang vs John Esbenshade / Daniel Moe1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Erik Graver vs William Paulling / Hayes Trotter6-3, 6-3
2025-07-02vs DTC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Jason Wang vs Curtis Turner / David Turner7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJonathan Bach vs Morris Askenazi4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Erik Graver vs David Fawley / Stephen Olsen7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJimmie Rose / BRIAN ROSENTHAL vs Gary Friedman / William Nelson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-26vs LTFC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Jason Wang vs Tom van Denover / Thomas Samuelson5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlex Gurevich vs Vance Wagenknecht3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Nobles / Ali Barghelame vs Rich Nipert / Simon Payne6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBRIAN ROSENTHAL / Randal Ankeney vs Stephen Houy / Jeff Johnson6-3, 6-3
2025-06-18vs GAC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / James Parker vs Gabriel Damico / Marcus McAskin6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Bach vs Stephen Parmentier6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Jimmie Rose vs Thomas Forti / Terry Rigo6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAli Barghelame / Erik Graver vs Mark Arlen / David Hipshman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-11vs SKY BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck vs Bob Sullivan / Jeremy Thomas3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJonathan Malinzak vs Doug Wiley6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Nobles / James Parker vs Greg Rogers / Blake Johnson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRandal Ankeney / BRIAN ROSENTHAL vs Conn Flanigan / Rockwell Pearson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-04vs CACM ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesJason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck vs Hervey Pierre / Paul Barrow1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJonathan Bach vs John Wharton4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJimmie Rose / Randal Ankeney vs Adam Smith / Paul Jaszewski1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAli Barghelame / Daniel Chin vs Brian Wylie / Kendall Lin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Randal Ankeney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Ralf Weizenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Ali Barghelame
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Michael Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Jonathan Bach
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Jimmie Rose
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Erik Graver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Jason Wang
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.60
BRIAN ROSENTHAL
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Jonathan Malinzak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.57
Daniel Chin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Robert Saddler
published
Alex Gurevich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jimmie Rose + Randal Ankeney4358% games+8.3% vs expected
Jimmie Rose + Erik Graver3254% games+5.6% vs expected
Daniel Chin + Jason Wang3250% games+4.9% vs expected
Ralf Weizenbeck + Randal Ankeney3251% games−3.3% vs expected
Jason Wang + Ralf Weizenbeck4745% games−7.7% vs expected
Ali Barghelame + Michael Nobles2549% gamesnot enough data
Erik Graver + Ali Barghelame224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Chin + BRIAN ROSENTHAL224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randal Ankeney
18W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Ralf Weizenbeck
40W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ali Barghelame
57W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Michael Nobles
67W–78L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jonathan Bach
8W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Jimmie Rose
100W–94L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Erik Graver
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jason Wang
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
4
BRIAN ROSENTHAL
9W–9L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jonathan Malinzak
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Daniel Chin
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Robert Saddler
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Alex Gurevich
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.