Teams

EBattle (Sardis)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-06vs EAnderson (Park Road)Won 10
W#2 SinglesDina Carey vs Emilia Anderson6-3, 6-3
2024-07-16vs JKarsek (Carmel)Won 10
W#3 SinglesLaura Warden vs Jasmine Karasek6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesLaura Warden vs Tekla Johnson6-1, 6-3
2024-06-18vs SAnderson (Queens)Won 10
W#3 SinglesDina Carey vs Luz Lim6-1, 6-0
2024-06-11vs KSalina (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesLaura Warden vs Kristin Salina6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDina Carey vs Melissa Pavlovich6-1, 6-0
2024-05-21vs MJBurns (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLaura Warden vs Katherine Stencel4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Mary Laird Garrison
published
3.49
Kendra Treece
published 3.5
3.48
Kimberly Battle
published
3.35
Emily Battle
published
3.32
Laura Warden
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Dina Carey
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie Ferry
published
2.63
Kate Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Johnson + Kimberly Battle224 matchesnot enough data
Kendra Treece + Dina Carey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Laird Garrison
33W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.61
3.5
Kendra Treece
62W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
Kimberly Battle
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Emily Battle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Laura Warden
47W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dina Carey
39W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Katie Ferry
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.10
Kate Johnson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%18%82%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.