Teams

GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult40&over/3.0W81251126249
2GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Alvarado/EPTC#272231331268
3GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/DaCosta/EPTC#372221433298
4GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#263211534313
5GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Castaneda/EPCC#154211535290
6GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#236162045328
7GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB36132347338
8GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#136132350332
9GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC27152146338
10GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#418102655375

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Edina Salazar
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Flor Tovar
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Graciela Saenz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Irma Portillo
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Laura Odell
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Leidiana Baca
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Mary Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published
Michele Zerah
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Monica de la Torre
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Stephanie Beckles
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Veronica Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica de la Torre + Patricia Arreola61145% games−5.9% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Graciela Saenz + Veronica Gonzalez8653% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Patricia Arreola8461% gamesnot enough data
Mary Chavez + Monica de la Torre5550% gamesnot enough data
Monica de la Torre + Laura Odell5549% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Laura Odell5357% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Gonzalez + Sara Blanco3550% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edina Salazar
38W–49L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Flor Tovar
23W–20L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
61W–87L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Graciela Saenz
50W–58L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Irma Portillo
21W–40L career · 44 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Odell
50W–41L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leidiana Baca
23W–34L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–47L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Chavez
18W–14L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Zerah
13W–43L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica de la Torre
39W–41L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
45W–59L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–69L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Beckles
69W–60L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Veronica Gonzalez
48W–70L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.