GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult40&over/3.0W

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult40&over/3.0W	8	1	25	11	26	249
2GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Alvarado/EPTC#2	7	2	23	13	31	268
3GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/DaCosta/EPTC#3	7	2	22	14	33	298
4GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#2	6	3	21	15	34	313
5GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Castaneda/EPCC#1	5	4	21	15	35	290
6GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#2	3	6	16	20	45	328
7GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB	3	6	13	23	47	338
8GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#1	3	6	13	23	50	332
9GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC	2	7	15	21	46	338
10GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#4	1	8	10	26	55	375

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72

Ana Baca

usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3

2.71

Angelica Alarcon

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.51

Cecilia Marquez

usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 3

—

Eufemia Garcia

usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published —

—

Hadley Huchton

usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Karla Griffin

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published —

—

Kati Hunyadi

usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Leyla Ramirez

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Lilly Gutierrez Molina

usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Luisana Montoya

usually #1 Singles 54%, also #2 Singles 27% · published —

—

Michele Cicchetti

usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Sandra Castaneda

usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published —

—

Sandra David

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published —

—

Sandy Salazar

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Sylvia Vega

usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Yzahiti Angulo

usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelica Alarcon + Luisana Montoya	10–7	56% games	+13.5% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Cecilia Marquez	7–4	56% games	not enough data
Sylvia Vega + Lilly Gutierrez Molina	6–5	55% games	not enough data
Lilly Gutierrez Molina + Karla Griffin	9–2	65% games	not enough data
Sandy Salazar + Yzahiti Angulo	8–1	61% games	not enough data
Leyla Ramirez + Michele Cicchetti	4–4	41% games	not enough data
Kati Hunyadi + Lilly Gutierrez Molina	7–0	73% games	not enough data
Leyla Ramirez + Luisana Montoya	3–2	51% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ana Baca

43W–42L career · 23 lines in 2026

5%92%2%

2.72

Angelica Alarcon

28W–51L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026

7%91%2%

2.71

Cecilia Marquez

64W–57L career · 11 lines in 2026

47%53%<1%

2.51

—

Eufemia Garcia

81W–125L career · 26 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Hadley Huchton

10W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Karla Griffin

53W–28L career · 41 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Kati Hunyadi

76W–65L career · 47 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Leyla Ramirez

31W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lilly Gutierrez Molina

38W–32L career · 41 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Luisana Montoya

52W–35L career · 25 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Michele Cicchetti

47W–110L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sandra Castaneda

59W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sandra David

26W–37L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sandy Salazar

11W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sylvia Vega

27W–40L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Yzahiti Angulo

55W–68L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.