GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Alvarado/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.92 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings10 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult40&over/3.0W	8	1	25	11	26	249
2GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Alvarado/EPTC#2	7	2	23	13	31	268
3GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/DaCosta/EPTC#3	7	2	22	14	33	298
4GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#2	6	3	21	15	34	313
5GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Castaneda/EPCC#1	5	4	21	15	35	290
6GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#2	3	6	16	20	45	328
7GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB	3	6	13	23	47	338
8GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#1	3	6	13	23	50	332
9GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC	2	7	15	21	46	338
10GEPTA/40&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#4	1	8	10	26	55	375

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11

Daniela Baylon

usually #2 Doubles 26%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3

2.90

Claudia Morones

usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.86

Cristal Alvarez

usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3

2.79

Brenda Campos Chacon

usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published 3

2.78

Dania Cuellar

usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3

2.46

CARMEN LEMUS

usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5

—

Dimna Arias

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Flor Alvarado

usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published —

—

Laura Arriaga

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Lorena Chavez

usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

—

Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Martha Chavez

usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Rocio Avila

usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published —

—

Sonia Rangel

usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published —

—

Teresa Escalante

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Zaira Delgado

usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 23% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Flor Alvarado + Rocio Avila	9–5	58% games	+8.1% vs expected
Lorena Chavez + Laura Arriaga	8–6	54% games	not enough data
Lorena Chavez + Sonia Rangel	4–7	43% games	not enough data
Flor Alvarado + Claudia Morones	5–5	51% games	not enough data
Martha Chavez + Claudia Morones	8–0	69% games	not enough data
Sonia Rangel + Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia	4–1	70% games	not enough data
Dania Cuellar + CARMEN LEMUS	3–2	58% games	not enough data
Flor Alvarado + Teresa Escalante	3–1	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Daniela Baylon

42W–21L career · 30 lines in 2026

<1%22%78%

3.11

Claudia Morones

48W–61L career · 24 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

2.90

Cristal Alvarez

22W–10L career · 18 lines in 2026

1%84%16%

2.86

Brenda Campos Chacon

25W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

2.79

Dania Cuellar

24W–15L career · 19 lines in 2026

2%92%5%

2.78

2.5

CARMEN LEMUS

33W–21L career · 24 lines in 2026

0%62%38%

2.46

—

Dimna Arias

9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Flor Alvarado

71W–68L career · 31 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Laura Arriaga

15W–11L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Lorena Chavez

52W–62L career · 34 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia

20W–12L career · 20 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Martha Chavez

19W–10L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rocio Avila

58W–30L career · 27 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sonia Rangel

32W–70L career · 33 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Teresa Escalante

7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Zaira Delgado

54W–34L career · 39 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.