Teams

Clark - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesKevin Groom / Ryan Elliott vs Mario Stramaglia / Jason Struck4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJerry Clark / Will Grace vs Collin Crowson / Joseph Truncale3-6, 1-6
2025-09-16vs Smith - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesJerry Clark / Jeffrey Henderson vs Tim James / Beau Bullard6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-09vs Fabbro - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesJerry Clark / Ryan Sellars vs Zach Pohlmann / Addison van Pelt7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJames Richardson / Kevin Groom vs Brett Worley / Mario Stramaglia1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Smith - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarl Miller / Kevin Groom vs James Smith / Michael Yager4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesEthan Rhone / Jerry Clark vs Russell Smith / Tracy Schmidt6-1, 6-3
2025-08-19vs Fabbro - RS ClayLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Richardson / Ryan Elliott vs Kyle Wilson / Colton Wilson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Abel / Kenneth Wallace vs Wade Wilson / Nick Farkas1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWill Grace / Ryan Sellars vs Matthew Meekins / Matthew O'Neill3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJerry Clark / Jeffrey Henderson vs Collin Crowson / Ryan Worley6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Kevin Groom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Ryan Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
James Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Gregory Gill
published 3.5
3.40
James Craft
published 3.5
3.33
Jeffrey Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Craig Abel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jerry Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Kenneth Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Ethan Rhone
published 3
2.88
Ryan Sellars
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Will Grace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Abel + Gregory Gill4254% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Groom
50W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
James Richardson
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Gregory Gill
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
James Craft
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jeffrey Henderson
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Craig Abel
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
Kenneth Wallace
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Sellars
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Will Grace
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.