Teams

Smith - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-08vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Schmidt / Ed Souza vs Clay Anderson / Nick Farkas6-4, 6-4
2025-10-07vs Clark - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / Donald Herip vs Craig Abel / James Craft6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymond Dillabough / George Rials vs Chase Dupuis / Peyton Blackledge1-6, 0-6
2025-09-23vs Fabbro - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / Kazunobu Kawada vs Robert Fabbro / Frederic Letourneau6-3, 7-6
2025-09-17vs Richardson - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesLuis Camero / Tracy Schmidt vs Clay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMarion Elsas / Colin Jones vs Brett Worley / Jason Struck6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-02vs Fabbro - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Smith / Marion Elsas vs Kyle Wilson / Colton Wilson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / Luis Camero vs Wade Wilson / Nick Kitchel4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesJames Smith / Marion Elsas vs Kyle Wilson / Colton Wilson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesLuis Camero / Tracy Schmidt vs Clay Anderson / Wade Wilson7-5, 6-2
2025-08-26vs Clark - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / Teddie Betonio vs Craig Abel / Kenneth Wallace6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kazunobu Kawada
published
3.81
Colin Jones
published 4
3.69
Michael Yager
published
3.50
George Rials
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Marion Elsas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Luis Camero
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Beau Bullard
published 3
2.88
Tracy Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Campbell Esquerre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donald Herip
published
Tim James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luis Camero + Tracy Schmidt123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Schmidt + Beau Bullard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kazunobu Kawada
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Colin Jones
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Michael Yager
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
George Rials
95W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Marion Elsas
19W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Luis Camero
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Beau Bullard
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tracy Schmidt
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Campbell Esquerre
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Donald Herip
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.