Teams

Escambia/Worley/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0M

2025 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-16vs Fabbro - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnthony Bonjorno / Rudy Seelmann vs Frederic Letourneau / Will Spencer2-6, 3-6
2025-09-09vs Smith - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrett Worley / Jason Struck vs Marion Elsas / Colin Jones3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-02vs Clark - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrett Worley / Mario Stramaglia vs James Richardson / Kevin Groom6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-26vs Fabbro - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Seelmann / Mario Stramaglia vs Robert Fabbro / Will Spencer7-6, 7-5
2025-08-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrett Worley / Jason Struck vs James Smith / Colin Jones4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Mario Stramaglia
published
3.96
Josh Sitton
published
3.90
Anthony Bonjorno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Jason Struck
published
3.82
3.79
Rudy Seelmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Alex Leonard
published 4
3.66
Tucker Massey
published
3.63
Brett Worley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Peyton Blackledge
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Chase Dupuis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Christopher Zuber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Ryan Worley
published
2.96
Collin Crowson
published 3
Joseph Truncale
published
Tyler Gross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Worley + Christopher Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Rudy Seelmann + Brett Worley213 matchesnot enough data
Rudy Seelmann + Jason Struck123 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Zuber + Chase Dupuis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mario Stramaglia
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Josh Sitton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4.5
Anthony Bonjorno
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
Jason Struck
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christopher Brown
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Rudy Seelmann
95W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Alex Leonard
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Tucker Massey
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Brett Worley
94W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Peyton Blackledge
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Chase Dupuis
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Christopher Zuber
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Worley
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
3
Collin Crowson
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Joseph Truncale
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Gross
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.