Teams

CV-Mission Hills CC/Mary Kaump

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-26vs CV-La Quinta Resort/RolstonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCamille Lamoureux / Mary Kaump vs Beverly Hovorka / Lori Hayes7-6, 7-6
2023-03-05vs CV-Toscana CC/Sturdyvin & BlaserLost 01
L#1 SinglesCamille Lamoureux vs Kristine Blaser6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-26vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert & KimSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPage Garcia / Camille Lamoureux vs Allyson Marks / Nadine Kim6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSue Lambert / Marguerita Gilbertson vs Ann Crampton / Deborah Poe2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-18vs CV-Palm Desert TC/HouseLost 01
L#2 DoublesCamille Lamoureux / Susan Devereaux vs Sally Mangina / Mary Marks6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-05vs CV-La Quinta Resort/RolstonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Patton / Camille Lamoureux vs Yoko McSweeney / Rhonda Gerke4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-29vs CV-Toscana CC/Sturdyvin & BlaserWon 10
W#1 SinglesCamille Lamoureux vs Rebecca Bratlien6-2, 6-1
2023-01-22vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert & KimWon 10
W#3 DoublesSue Lambert / Marguerita Gilbertson vs Bozena Barris / Anne Dickinson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-08vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/KouwabunpatLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Lambert / Susan Devereaux vs Lorna Matthew / Maureen Jaramillo5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Carla Breton
published 4
Cheryl Evans
published 4
3.63
Camille Lamoureux
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Mary Kaump
published
3.47
Katie Scullion
published
Lori Romania
published
Michelle Patton
published
Page Garcia
published
Sue Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Devereaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Patton + Susan Devereaux404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carla Breton
77W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Cheryl Evans
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Camille Lamoureux
19W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Mary Kaump
27W–24L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Katie Scullion
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lori Romania
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Patton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Page Garcia
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Lambert
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Devereaux
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.