Teams

LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/Kouwabunpat

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-03-26Won 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Finnell / Lisa Symmonds vs Kristine Blaser / Elizabeth Dobell6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudi Marchand / Rhonda Kazdan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-05vs CV-Palm Desert TC/HouseWon 10
W#2 DoublesSally Sterling / Rhonda Kazdan vs Mistie Iseman / Sally Mangina6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-26vs CV-La Quinta Resort/RolstonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRhonda Kazdan / Sally Sterling vs Beverly Hovorka / Kathy Ferrari6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAshley Matkin / Jennifer Finnell vs Janet Gallagher / Rhonda Gerke6-4, 6-2
2023-02-19vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert & KimSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJudi Marchand / Rhonda Kazdan vs Ann Crampton / Anne Dickinson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLorna Matthew / Meg Maloney vs Bozena Barris / Gayle Friedman4-6, 5-7
2023-02-12vs CV-Mission Hills CC/Mary KaumpWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Sterling / Rhonda Kazdan vs Pat Chawla / Maureen Diamond6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Monahan / Erin Gurney vs Mary Kaump / Carla Breton3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Matkin / Tammy Pronenko vs Valerie Kolytiris / Lori Romania6-3, 6-3
2023-02-05vs CV-Toscana CC/Sturdyvin & BlaserWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorna Matthew / Rhonda Kazdan vs Kristine Blaser / Heather McKay6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMeg Maloney / Tammy Pronenko vs JANELL TESSLER / Taunja Feldman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Symmonds / Jennifer Finnell vs Cynthia Mulflur / Colleen Ecker6-2, 6-2
2023-01-29vs CV-Palm Desert TC/HouseWon 21
L#1 SinglesMeg Maloney vs Mary Marks0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSally Sterling / Maureen Jaramillo vs Marjo Hull / Donna Wrigley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAshley Matkin / Erin Gurney vs Leslie Ellis / Doreen Buchy6-4, 6-1
2023-01-22vs CV-La Quinta Resort/RolstonWon 20
W#2 DoublesJudi Marchand / Sally Sterling vs Yoko McSweeney / Lori Hayes6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAshley Matkin / Jennifer Finnell vs Mary Read / Mary Meyer6-2, 6-3
2023-01-15vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert & KimWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Matkin / Thelma Sahara vs Allyson Marks / Gayle Friedman6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSally Sterling / Maureen Jaramillo vs Dori Craft / Grace Baraniak6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJudi Marchand / Lisa Symmonds vs Anne Dickinson / Marian Zalewski5-7, 1-6
2023-01-08vs CV-Mission Hills CC/Mary KaumpWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Sterling / Rhonda Kazdan vs Cheryl Evans / Lori Romania6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kim Kouwabunpat
published
4.12
Sally Sterling
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.90
Rhonda Kazdan
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.80
Tammy Pronenko
published
Erin Gurney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Ginny Ehrlich
published
3.73
Maureen Jaramillo
published
3.73
Thelma Sahara
published
3.65
Ashley Matkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Meg Maloney
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Jennifer Finnell
published
3.57
Lorna Matthew
published
3.56
Kelly Diamond
published
3.53
Lisa Symmonds
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Judi Marchand
published
Sonja Lampasi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Sterling + Rhonda Kazdan421160% games+3.4% vs expected
Sally Sterling + Ashley Matkin3244% gamesnot enough data
Meg Maloney + Lorna Matthew033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Kouwabunpat
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
4.35
4
Sally Sterling
125W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.12
4
Rhonda Kazdan
51W–19L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Erin Gurney
72W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ginny Ehrlich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Maureen Jaramillo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Thelma Sahara
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ashley Matkin
91W–63L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Meg Maloney
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Jennifer Finnell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Lorna Matthew
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Kelly Diamond
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Lisa Symmonds
58W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Judi Marchand
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
Sonja Lampasi
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.