Teams

Atchison 3.5W 65s Th AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 65 & Over · 3.5 Women 65 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Nixon / Janis Beshears vs Cindy Beach / Robin Smith6-1, 6-3
2024-03-21vs Titzer 3.5W 65s Th AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Nixon / Judy Eaton vs Shelby Rhyne / Grace Titzer6-7, 2-6
2024-03-07vs HENSEL/URBAN 3.5W 65s Th AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Nixon / Susan Payne vs Diane Boger / Susan Pardue6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Mary Jane Tarver
published
3.38
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.32
Mary Ann Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Lynn Tester
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.29
Nancy McNeill
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.19
Anne Thornton
published 3.5
3.18
Theresa Atchison
published
3.06
Jody Susong
published
3.00
Janis Beshears
published
2.96
Nancy McCoy
published
2.94
2.75
Susan Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janis Beshears + Jody Susong2443% gamesnot enough data
Mary Jane Tarver + Susan Payne5072% gamesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Judy Eaton314 matchesnot enough data
Judy Eaton + Nancy McNeill314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jane Tarver + Theresa Atchison303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Thornton + Janis Beshears033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Tarver
20W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Margaret Reynolds
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Mary Ann Nixon
35W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.32
Lynn Tester
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Nancy McNeill
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Patty Dutton
19W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Anne Thornton
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Theresa Atchison
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Jody Susong
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Janis Beshears
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Nancy McCoy
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Deterding
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
2.94
Susan Payne
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.