Teams

Life Time Ruby 18+ 2.5 Day

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · 2.5 Day

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-07vs SMC Topspins 18+2.5 DayWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Limekiller / Ilana Seidman vs Daria Culver / Nell Shapiro6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-30vs Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesMilena Fried / Helen Shuli vs Magnolia Grossman / Alisha Vazquez4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJenna Lebowich / Valerie Limekiller vs Barbara Corini / KAREN Unger1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesIlana Seidman / Martina Schikorr vs Meghan Jin / Christine Corr6-4, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMilena Fried vs Lisette Aller0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJenna Lebowich / Carol Froehlich-Hull vs Renea Dayton / Melissa Bahr3-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesValerie Limekiller / Kim MacRi vs Aura Parks / Ali Aizer6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMilena Fried vs Chrissy Gingue4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJenna Lebowich / Ilana Seidman vs Jacqueline Calica / Fawn McGinty1-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs Rye Rec -18+ 2.5 W - Volley GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnita Rosner / Valerie Limekiller vs Lisa Goldfine / Brooke Barrow6-7, 2-4
L#1 SinglesMilena Fried vs Cecilia Lindau2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Froehlich-Hull / Ilana Seidman vs Gina Czark / Lisa Farrington4-6, 3-5
2026-05-19vs SMC Topspins 18+2.5 DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim MacRi / Milena Fried vs Daria Culver / Iris Glass6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCarol Froehlich-Hull / Ilana Seidman vs Maria Cardozo / Nell Shapiro6-7, 5-7
2026-05-12vs NRRC - 18+ 2.5 - Nice RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim MacRi / Milena Fried vs Kerry Tarr / Purvi Shah3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnita Ware vs Adriana Souza6-2, 2-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Froehlich-Hull / Ilana Seidman vs Jennifer Riguardi / Sara Scanlon0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesHelen Shuli / Milena Fried vs S Kasim / Alice Kung7-5, 5-4
W#1 SinglesAnita Ware vs Marybeth Sheppard6-4, 4-3
W#2 DoublesJenna Lebowich / Ilana Seidman vs Susan Benkelman / Joan Indig6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NRRC - 18+ 2.5 - Nice Racquettes0816818161
2SMC Topspins 18+2.5 Day0817719180
3Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 Day08141024198
4Chestnut Ridge Court Queens - 18+ 2.5 Day08121124176
5Rye Rec -18+ 2.5 W - Volley Girls08121225211
6Life Time Ruby 18+ 2.5 Day08101329226
7Yonkers Tennis Center 18+ 2.5 W - Love and Deuces0891531222
8The Domes Armonk - 18+ 2.5 - Some Strings Attached0851939240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Mingzhang Zeng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Massaro
published 2.5
Anita Rosner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Kim MacRi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Liz Chbosky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Helen Shuli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Ilana Seidman
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.15
Anita Ware
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Valerie Limekiller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.97
Milena Fried
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
1.91
Jenna Lebowich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.87
Carol Froehlich-Hull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jessica Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Shuli + Liz Chbosky4350% games+2.8% vs expected
Kim MacRi + Milena Fried1441% games−3.5% vs expected
Helen Shuli + Kim MacRi1541% games−4.9% vs expected
Jenna Lebowich + Jessica Brown044 matchesnot enough data
Anita Ware + Helen Shuli123 matchesnot enough data
Kim MacRi + Mingzhang Zeng123 matchesnot enough data
Kim MacRi + Valerie Limekiller123 matchesnot enough data
Ilana Seidman + Valerie Limekiller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mingzhang Zeng
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Andrea Massaro
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anita Rosner
2W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kim MacRi
20W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Liz Chbosky
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Helen Shuli
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Ilana Seidman
3W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Anita Ware
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Valerie Limekiller
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Milena Fried
4W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Jenna Lebowich
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
2.5
Carol Froehlich-Hull
1W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Jessica Brown
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.