Teams

NRRC - 18+ 2.5 - Nice Racquettes

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · 2.5 Day

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ham / Anne Wagstaff vs Aura Parks / Hillary Harrison6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLindsay Druker / Valerie Ferrara vs Fawn McGinty / Stephanie Boyd6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ham / Sara Scanlon vs S Kasim / Alice Kung6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesPurvi Shah vs Ali Moss6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebra Albert / Lucia Speight vs Catherine Murphy / Hope Van Winkle4-6, 4-6
2026-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPurvi Shah / Lucia Speight vs Wendy Tiling Liu / Lisa Goldfine4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKerry Tarr / Purvi Shah vs Stephanie Boyd / Hillary Harrison6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDanielle Klein vs Rachel Kwitman6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNina Cherian / Debra Albert vs Emily Winston / Leah Weinberg6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesLucia Speight / Anne Wagstaff vs Elizabeth Breakstone / Meghan Jin6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy C. Kessler / Mia Jung-Smith vs Lisette Aller / Debbie Avidane6-2, 6-0
2026-05-19vs Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Klein / Anne Wagstaff vs Barbara Corini / Frances Magrino6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Riguardi / Sara Scanlon vs Eleonora Andreeva / Gabriella Matsotso6-3, 6-3
2026-05-12vs Life Time Ruby 18+ 2.5 DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesKerry Tarr / Purvi Shah vs Kim MacRi / Milena Fried6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAdriana Souza vs Anita Ware2-6, 4-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Riguardi / Sara Scanlon vs Carol Froehlich-Hull / Ilana Seidman6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-05vs SMC Topspins 18+2.5 DaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Druker / Kerry Tarr vs Annie Bai / Suzanne Oliva7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDanielle Klein vs Julie Creech6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NRRC - 18+ 2.5 - Nice Racquettes0816818161
2SMC Topspins 18+2.5 Day0817719180
3Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 Day08141024198
4Chestnut Ridge Court Queens - 18+ 2.5 Day08121124176
5Rye Rec -18+ 2.5 W - Volley Girls08121225211
6Life Time Ruby 18+ 2.5 Day08101329226
7Yonkers Tennis Center 18+ 2.5 W - Love and Deuces0891531222
8The Domes Armonk - 18+ 2.5 - Some Strings Attached0851939240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Jennifer Ham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Lindsay Druker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Danielle Klein
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Melissa Klosk
published
2.25
Kerry Tarr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Anne Wagstaff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Mia Jung-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Sara Scanlon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.15
Adriana Souza
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Debra Albert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Purvi Shah
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.09
Lucia Speight
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.08
Valerie Ferrara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Grace Contopoulos
published
Jeannine Gerhardt
published
Meghan Donohue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Purvi Shah + Kerry Tarr8654% games+6.1% vs expected
Purvi Shah + Debra Albert0532% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Ham + Lindsay Druker404 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Tarr + Anne Wagstaff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Ham
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Lindsay Druker
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Danielle Klein
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Melissa Klosk
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Kerry Tarr
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Anne Wagstaff
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Mia Jung-Smith
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Sara Scanlon
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Adriana Souza
22W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Debra Albert
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Purvi Shah
12W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Lucia Speight
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Valerie Ferrara
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Grace Contopoulos
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeannine Gerhardt
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meghan Donohue
10W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.