Teams

Yonkers Tennis Center 18+ 2.5 W - Love and Deuces

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · 2.5 Day

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-16vs NRRC - 18+ 2.5 - Nice RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesS Kasim / Alice Kung vs Jennifer Ham / Sara Scanlon0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAli Moss vs Purvi Shah1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Murphy / Hope Van Winkle vs Debra Albert / Lucia Speight6-4, 6-4
2026-06-09vs SMC Topspins 18+2.5 DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Hand / Joan Indig vs Daria Culver / Iris Glass1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAli Moss vs Eleanor Hershey2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Murphy / Hope Van Winkle vs Debbie Linehan / Julie Creech6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesS Kasim / Alice Kung vs Lisette Aller / Christine Corr6-7, 0-3
W#1 SinglesMarybeth Sheppard vs Meghan Jin6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Hand / Nancy Tomanek vs Melissa Bahr / Rebecca Fisher7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesNoelle DelGiudice / Nancy Tomanek vs Fawn McGinty / Chrissy Gingue7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Murphy / Hope Van Winkle vs Ali Aizer / Jacqueline Calica6-3, 6-4
2026-05-19vs Rye Rec -18+ 2.5 W - Volley GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarybeth Sheppard / Joan Indig vs Kelly Oneill / Lisa Goldfine4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Benkelman vs Cecilia Lindau0-6, 0-3
W#2 DoublesAlice Kung / S Kasim vs Julie Hickey / Gina Czark6-1, 6-0
2026-05-12vs Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Benkelman / Marybeth Sheppard vs Michelle Addona / Frances Magrino6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNoelle DelGiudice vs Gabriella Matsotso6-2, 6-4
2026-05-05vs Life Time Ruby 18+ 2.5 DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesS Kasim / Alice Kung vs Helen Shuli / Milena Fried5-7, 4-5
L#1 SinglesMarybeth Sheppard vs Anita Ware4-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Benkelman / Joan Indig vs Jenna Lebowich / Ilana Seidman2-6, 5-7
2026-04-28vs Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 DayLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarybeth Sheppard / Nancy Tomanek vs Eleonora Andreeva / Frances Magrino4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAli Moss vs Alisha Vazquez0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Benkelman / Amy Hand vs KAREN Unger / Eleni Liapi0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NRRC - 18+ 2.5 - Nice Racquettes0816818161
2SMC Topspins 18+2.5 Day0817719180
3Sportime HI 18+ 2.5 Day08141024198
4Chestnut Ridge Court Queens - 18+ 2.5 Day08121124176
5Rye Rec -18+ 2.5 W - Volley Girls08121225211
6Life Time Ruby 18+ 2.5 Day08101329226
7Yonkers Tennis Center 18+ 2.5 W - Love and Deuces0891531222
8The Domes Armonk - 18+ 2.5 - Some Strings Attached0851939240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Deanna Santoro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.46
Marybeth Sheppard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.39
Ali Moss
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Noelle DelGiudice
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.25
Alice Kung
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.08
Hope Van Winkle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Susan Benkelman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.04
S Kasim
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.99
Nancy Tomanek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.88
Joan Indig
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alice Kung + S Kasim134 matchesnot enough data
S Kasim + Susan Benkelman044 matchesnot enough data
Alice Kung + Joan Indig123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Santoro
69W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Marybeth Sheppard
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Ali Moss
5W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Noelle DelGiudice
14W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Alice Kung
15W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Hope Van Winkle
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Susan Benkelman
1W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
S Kasim
4W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Nancy Tomanek
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Joan Indig
5W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.