Teams

ICC - Rudder (Thurs. 6.5)

2025 B'ham Combo - Adult 40 & Over Women Weekday · 6.5 Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-21vs West Homewood - GrillWon 21
W#1 DoublesMallory Carrington / Terri Palco vs Courtney Grill / Lauren Calagaz2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Mathis / Cindy Hodo vs Katy Bishop / Rebecca Sheffer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Pihakis / Angie Miller vs Robin Griffis / Paula Ryan-Farrell4-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs Greystone CC - Knouse/WheelerLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Mathis / Cindy Hodo vs Marilyn Pauls / Joni Wheeler6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Einfalt / Terri Palco vs Leslie Kramer / Anne McGavin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Rudder / Mallory Carrington vs Angie Beaubien / LeAnne Kahn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-07vs Riverchase - TidwellWon 21
W#1 DoublesMallory Carrington / Andrea Rudder vs Donna Bagwell / Rosa Hill6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJane Emmerth / Jennifer Pihakis vs Janice Wash / Yvonne Segrest7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Kallus / Pamela Holton vs Merideth Rodgers / Whitney McFarlin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-24vs HCC - Goetz/WattsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Lancaster / Cindy Hodo vs Elizabeth Mitchell / Lena Martinez5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Miller / Jennifer Pihakis vs Kelly Connelly / Shannon Johnston6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelissa Ford / Pamela Holton vs Ashley Goetz / Katherine Scott6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRebecca Mathis / Angie Miller vs Shannon Berg / Tiffany Griffin7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Ford / Jane Emmerth vs Ginger Kontos / Valerie Holmes1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLauri Derecki / Cindy Hodo vs Dawn Bastarache / Julie Anderson6-4, 6-2
2025-07-10vs BHRC - Graves/DuffyWon 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Hodo / Nancy Kallus vs Charlotte Booth / Jennifer Blumberg5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Einfalt / Jane Emmerth vs Ginger Graves / Gorgeana Wilkerson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Lancaster / Andrea Rudder vs Debbie Mitchell / Beverly Thomas7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Rebecca Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Mallory Carrington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Nancy Kallus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Andrea Rudder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Lauri Derecki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Suzanne Einfalt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jennifer Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Terri Palco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Pamela Holton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Jane Emmerth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Angie Miller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Cindy Hodo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jennifer Pihakis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Emmerth + Terri Palco6161% games+15.8% vs expected
Suzanne Einfalt + Lauri Derecki1543% games−0.2% vs expected
Suzanne Einfalt + Mallory Carrington2350% games−4.3% vs expected
Suzanne Einfalt + Terri Palco224 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Einfalt + Jennifer Lancaster303 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Rudder + Lauri Derecki213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Rudder + Terri Palco213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Lancaster + Lauri Derecki123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Mathis
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Mallory Carrington
44W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Nancy Kallus
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrea Rudder
38W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Lauri Derecki
20W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Suzanne Einfalt
17W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Lancaster
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Terri Palco
69W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Pamela Holton
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Jane Emmerth
28W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Angie Miller
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Hodo
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60
Jennifer Pihakis
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.