Teams

3TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F3

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-06vs 4FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Won 20
W#1 SinglesHeidi Hermann vs Carmen Walker6-3, 5-0
W#2 SinglesRebeca Beliard vs Amira Lewis7-5, 2-2
W#1 SinglesClaudia Langsdorf vs Alexandra Sviridova6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChristine Hunt vs Dawn Sills7-5, 2-3
W#3 SinglesJacqueline Weaver vs Joyce Nasrallah6-3, 6-0
2024-11-16vs 2WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Won 30
W#1 SinglesLora Leslie vs Nora Beevers6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMelanie Hovey vs Terri Griffin6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLaura Colbert vs Nina Brown6-3, 6-2
2024-11-09vs 4FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Won 30
W#1 SinglesMichelle Wooddell vs Franz D'Souza6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMelanie Hovey vs Amira Lewis6-4, 2-3
W#3 SinglesJacqueline Weaver vs Carmen Walker6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesClaudia Langsdorf vs Dawn Sills6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMelanie Hovey vs Bethany Petrylka6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHeidi Hermann vs Deanna Lites6-2, 6-2
2024-10-26vs 2WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 12
L#1 SinglesRebeca Beliard vs Terri Griffin1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChristine Hunt vs Sherry Du1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMelanie Hovey vs ELISA CARRARO6-3, 4-5
2024-10-18vs 4FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 12
W#1 SinglesLora Leslie vs Carrie Heaney6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesHeidi Hermann vs Alexandra Sperl2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Farah vs Carlee Meyers3-6, 6-6
2024-10-12vs 2WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Won 30
W#1 SinglesMichelle Wooddell vs Nina Brown6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesChristine Hunt vs Nora Beevers7-5, 5-3
W#3 SinglesClaudia Langsdorf vs Susana Soler Miquel6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLora Leslie vs Alexandra Sviridova6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristine Hunt vs Joyce Nasrallah6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLaura Colbert vs Lalaine Labio2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-THOMAS 30WOMEN SING SEM F28121618183
23TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F37221615173
31WESS-WEHBE 30WOMEN SING SEM F272171021183
42HV-MOORE 30WOMEN SING SEM F160171272
52WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F363151225223
64FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F345131424212
71CHIP-JANG 30WOMEN SING SEM F1339920147
84SCWB-FLANNERY 30WOMEN SING SEM F236111634232
91LIFE-DEJAEGER 30WOMEN SING SEM F31852245291
103LIB-INOUE 30WOMEN SING SEM F10611731190
113FAC-URQUHART 30WOMEN SING SEM F20952241261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Lora Leslie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Michelle Wooddell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jacqueline Weaver
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Claudia Langsdorf
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Christine Hunt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Melanie Hovey
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Jennifer Farah
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Rebeca Beliard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Michelle Keilen
published 3
2.64
Laura Colbert
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Heidi Hermann
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Hovey + Claudia Langsdorf6455% games+5.3% vs expected
Melanie Hovey + Jacqueline Weaver4644% games−5.6% vs expected
Jennifer Farah + Melanie Hovey224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Colbert + Melanie Hovey123 matchesnot enough data
Christine Hunt + Melanie Hovey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lora Leslie
52W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Michelle Wooddell
143W–150L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jacqueline Weaver
55W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Claudia Langsdorf
105W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Christine Hunt
109W–113L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Melanie Hovey
187W–133L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Jennifer Farah
94W–68L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Rebeca Beliard
74W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Michelle Keilen
76W–60L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Laura Colbert
100W–127L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Heidi Hermann
63W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.