Teams

3FAC-URQUHART 30WOMEN SING SEM F2

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-07vs 4SCWB-FLANNERY 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsey Weitzman. vs Katherine Ross6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDayana Schemel vs Victoria Swiencicki6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCathryn Luria vs Ana White1-6, 1-6
2024-11-23vs 1WESS-WEHBE 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMarva Brooks vs Stephanie Finland1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesOtome Kitamura vs Dina Hurnevich6-4, 0-3
L#3 SinglesCathryn Luria vs Mikhael Reamer3-6, 0-6
2024-11-15vs 2EAST-THOMAS 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAudrey Urquhart vs Amber Moore5-7, 3-5
L#2 SinglesOtome Kitamura vs Esther Thomas6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-08vs 4SCWB-FLANNERY 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesOtome Kitamura vs Elizabeth Simpson3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEmma Weintraub vs Beth Flannery0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCathryn Luria vs Stephane Lubin0-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs 1WESS-WEHBE 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsey Weitzman. vs Patty Joliat2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDayana Schemel vs Lindsay Baker7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAudrey Urquhart vs Rikki Puzzuoli1-6, 2-5
2024-10-26vs 2EAST-THOMAS 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAudrey Urquhart vs Jenifer Horn0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStacy Holloman vs Amber Moore0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesEmma Weintraub vs Cecilia Ortiz-Capisano1-6, 0-6
2024-10-19vs 4SCWB-FLANNERY 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesOtome Kitamura vs Elizabeth Simpson4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey Weitzman. vs Victoria Swiencicki6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJulie Lowenthal vs Beth Flannery3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-05vs 1WESS-WEHBE 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 SinglesOtome Kitamura vs Stephanie Finland0-6, 5-4
L#2 SinglesMarva Brooks vs Lindsay Baker5-7, 3-3
W#3 SinglesDayana Schemel vs Rikki Puzzuoli6-2, 4-2
2024-09-28vs 2EAST-THOMAS 30WOMEN SING SEM F2Lost 03
L#1 SinglesStacy Holloman vs Jenifer Horn0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMarva Brooks vs Amber Moore3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJulie Lowenthal vs Jamie Wilkerson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-THOMAS 30WOMEN SING SEM F28121618183
23TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F37221615173
31WESS-WEHBE 30WOMEN SING SEM F272171021183
42HV-MOORE 30WOMEN SING SEM F160171272
52WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F363151225223
64FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F345131424212
71CHIP-JANG 30WOMEN SING SEM F1339920147
84SCWB-FLANNERY 30WOMEN SING SEM F236111634232
91LIFE-DEJAEGER 30WOMEN SING SEM F31852245291
103LIB-INOUE 30WOMEN SING SEM F10611731190
113FAC-URQUHART 30WOMEN SING SEM F20952241261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Lindsey Weitzman.
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.87
Dayana Schemel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.51
Stacy Holloman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.50
Audrey Urquhart
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.46
Marva Brooks
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Julie Lowenthal
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Emma Weintraub
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.08
Cathryn Luria
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Otome Kitamura
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayana Schemel + Marva Brooks71448% games−1.2% vs expected
Julie Lowenthal + Cathryn Luria11032% games−16.9% vs expected
Stacy Holloman + Marva Brooks1436% gamesnot enough data
Stacy Holloman + Audrey Urquhart2342% gamesnot enough data
Marva Brooks + Audrey Urquhart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lindsey Weitzman.
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Dayana Schemel
53W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Stacy Holloman
33W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Audrey Urquhart
28W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Marva Brooks
38W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Julie Lowenthal
26W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%78%22%
2.39
Emma Weintraub
8W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.13
2.5
Cathryn Luria
10W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Otome Kitamura
38W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.