Teams

1LIFE-DEJAEGER 30WOMEN SING SEM F3

2024 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM

9 players · average NTRP 2.94 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-07vs 2WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Langreet vs Nora Beevers3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDawn Sills vs Nina Brown3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesBethany Petrylka vs Susana Soler Miquel1-6, 4-6
2024-11-24vs 3TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Sviridova vs Claudia Langsdorf3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDawn Sills vs Christine Hunt5-7, 3-2
L#3 SinglesJoyce Nasrallah vs Jacqueline Weaver3-6, 0-6
2024-11-17vs 4FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 03
L#1 SinglesLalaine Labio vs Alexandra Sperl4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Langreet vs Carlee Meyers5-7, 1-5
L#3 SinglesDeanna Lites vs Amira Lewis0-6, 3-6
2024-11-10vs 2WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Sviridova vs Nora Beevers2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoyce Nasrallah vs Sherry Du4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPatricia Dejaeger vs Lina Carouba6-4, 2-3
2024-11-02vs 3TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 03
L#1 SinglesDawn Sills vs Claudia Langsdorf3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBethany Petrylka vs Melanie Hovey3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDeanna Lites vs Heidi Hermann2-6, 2-6
2024-10-25vs 4FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Won 30
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Sviridova vs Carrie Heaney7-5, 5-1
W#2 SinglesLalaine Labio vs Carmen Walker6-3, 4-2
W#3 SinglesBethany Petrylka vs Amira Lewis6-3, 6-1
2024-10-19vs 2WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 03
L#1 SinglesDawn Sills vs Nora Beevers1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBethany Petrylka vs Annie Bakken4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesPatricia Dejaeger vs Nina Brown1-6, 2-6
2024-10-07vs 3TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAlexandra Sviridova vs Lora Leslie1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoyce Nasrallah vs Christine Hunt2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesLalaine Labio vs Laura Colbert6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-29vs 4FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F3Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Langreet vs Julie Kraemer0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPatricia Dejaeger vs Carmen Walker1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12EAST-THOMAS 30WOMEN SING SEM F28121618183
23TROY-HOVEY 30WOMEN SING SEM F37221615173
31WESS-WEHBE 30WOMEN SING SEM F272171021183
42HV-MOORE 30WOMEN SING SEM F160171272
52WESS-BROWN 30WOMEN SING SEM F363151225223
64FAC-LEWIS 30WOMEN SING SEM F345131424212
71CHIP-JANG 30WOMEN SING SEM F1339920147
84SCWB-FLANNERY 30WOMEN SING SEM F236111634232
91LIFE-DEJAEGER 30WOMEN SING SEM F31852245291
103LIB-INOUE 30WOMEN SING SEM F10611731190
113FAC-URQUHART 30WOMEN SING SEM F20952241261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Bethany Petrylka
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Alexandra Sviridova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.77
Lalaine Labio
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.67
Joyce Nasrallah
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Jennifer Langreet
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.56
Deanna Lites
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.41
Patricia Dejaeger
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Dawn Sills
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Lane McLeod
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Nasrallah + Alexandra Sviridova2539% games+1.0% vs expected
Lalaine Labio + Dawn Sills1636% games−1.0% vs expected
Joyce Nasrallah + Patricia Dejaeger1640% games−7.0% vs expected
Jennifer Langreet + Alexandra Sviridova1535% games−7.9% vs expected
Alexandra Sviridova + Patricia Dejaeger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Petrylka
48W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Alexandra Sviridova
59W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Lalaine Labio
30W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Joyce Nasrallah
18W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Jennifer Langreet
43W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Deanna Lites
14W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Patricia Dejaeger
45W–101L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Dawn Sills
9W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lane McLeod
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.