Teams

UPTA55C/Fischer/Pavilion

2025 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-15vs UPTA55C/Boliek/GCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Burnette / Jeannie Roberts vs Anna Turrentine / Catherine Dugas6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Branham / Sandra Hagler vs Danette Kabas / Kathy Cottingham6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLynne Todd / Maria Gulli vs Harriet Gray / Rhonda Jackson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-13vs UPTA55C/Clator/RiversideWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Burnette / Jennifer Tuttle vs Suzanne Morris / Liz Darrow6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJane Koubek / Laura McNeel vs Cristina Koehler / Edie Clator5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Wilson / Maria Gulli vs Teri Rushing / Suzanne Spotts6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jane Koubek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Tamarah Hagen
published
3.68
Christina Burnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Sandra Hagler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Rebecca Haas
published
3.61
Lynne Todd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Maria Gulli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Jennifer Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Julie Branham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Jeannie Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Laura McNeel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Angela Joffe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Katie Saad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Carlynn Eisner
published 3.5
Julie Jacob
published
Rhonda Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Branham + Sandra Hagler6063% games+13.0% vs expected
Laura McNeel + Jennifer Tuttle6160% games+4.1% vs expected
Laura McNeel + Jeannie Roberts91049% games−4.4% vs expected
Carlynn Eisner + Julie Jacob2541% games−7.3% vs expected
Jane Koubek + Rebecca Haas3250% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Hagler + Jeannie Roberts3255% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Todd + Maria Gulli314 matchesnot enough data
Jane Koubek + Sandra Hagler224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Koubek
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Tamarah Hagen
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Christina Burnette
38W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Sandra Hagler
51W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Rebecca Haas
41W–69L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
Lynne Todd
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Maria Gulli
64W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Tuttle
31W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Julie Branham
51W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jeannie Roberts
33W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Laura McNeel
38W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Angela Joffe
33W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Katie Saad
20W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carlynn Eisner
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Julie Jacob
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Fischer
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.