Teams

Team Steele

2026 NMI Adult 65&O · 2026 NMI Adult 65&O 7.0W

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs team vermettenWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Smock / Nan Spadacene vs Sandra Johnson / Cynthia Fairbanks6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Popper / Kathryn Levine vs Darlene Germaine / Mary Burdo7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Blewett / Teri Bickmore vs Shelley Boisvert / Lucia Elden3-6, 2-6
2026-08-02vs team vermettenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggi Steele / Cheryl Smock vs Sandra Johnson / Phoebe Hodge2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesValerie Dvorak / Barbara Brown vs Debra McKeon / Cynthia Fairbanks6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Popper / Patricia Blewett vs Babe Toteff / Shelley Boisvert2-6, 4-6
2026-08-01vs team vermettenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Lee Bretz / Barbara Brown vs Darlene Germaine / Mary Burdo4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaggi Steele / Cheryl Smock vs Babe Toteff / Debra McKeon6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPatricia Blewett / Nan Spadacene vs Lucia Elden / Phoebe Hodge1-6, 1-6
2026-08-01vs team vermettenLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smock / Valerie Dvorak vs Sandra Johnson / Phoebe Hodge3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNan Spadacene / Teri Bickmore vs Cynthia Fairbanks / Debra McKeon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Popper / Kathryn Levine vs Babe Toteff / Shelley Boisvert2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 NMI Adult 65&O 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1team vermetten3081251
2Team Steele031816106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Cheryl Smock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Mary Lee Bretz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Janet Popper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Barbara Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Maggi Steele
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nan Spadacene
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Blewett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Bickmore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Valerie Dvorak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Blewett + Maggi Steele6261% gamesnot enough data
Maggi Steele + Cheryl Smock4258% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Dvorak + Cheryl Smock1439% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Blewett + Janet Popper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Smock
22W–14L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Mary Lee Bretz
40W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Janet Popper
32W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Barbara Brown
73W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
Maggi Steele
34W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nan Spadacene
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Blewett
28W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teri Bickmore
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Dvorak
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.