Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW5.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

17 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-21vs CUESTA TC CW5.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Sheila McMahon / Lisa Mccaffrey vs Alexandra Jiang / Dipti Kumar4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-29vs CUESTA TC CW5.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Bowers / Lisa Mccaffrey vs Melissa Araza / Minjung Shin7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Kristi Sanders
published
2.94
Kristen Kincaid
published
2.92
Wendy Lombardi
published
2.87
Kristi Kaiser
published
2.79
Lisa Aldrich
published
2.78
Danielle Davila
published 2.5
2.75
Lindsay DeRose
published
2.74
Jamie Cegelski
published 3
2.72
Lynette Leighton
published
2.46
Diane de Seve
published 2.5
2.43
Kimmy Peterson
published
2.41
Jessica di Fede
published
2.39
Lisa Mccaffrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Laura Gaffey
published
2.27
Yenisel Arias
published
Lorena Serro
published
Mari Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Kaiser + Kristi Sanders5451% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Sanders
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kristen Kincaid
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Wendy Lombardi
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kristi Kaiser
10W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
Lisa Aldrich
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
2.5
Danielle Davila
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
Lindsay DeRose
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jamie Cegelski
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Lynette Leighton
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Diane de Seve
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Kimmy Peterson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
Jessica di Fede
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Lisa Mccaffrey
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.39
Laura Gaffey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29
Yenisel Arias
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Lorena Serro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mari Morris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.