Teams

Arnell Singles

2024 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-10vs Touchstone - NC/SnowdenWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Pacileo vs Marin Touchstone6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMorgan Pippen vs Christine Ohrberg6-2, 6-3
2024-12-01vs Black - NC - CC OxfordLost 02
L#1 SinglesMorgan Pippen vs Heather McDonald0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLacey Dunlap vs Reed Toms6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-26vs Rodgers- Singles Oxford 18+Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMorgan Pippen vs Bailey Rodgers3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Larkin vs Felicia Powell1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJennifer Pacileo vs Kathlene Poulelis6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-11-17vs Garner 18+ NCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Pacileo vs Devra Hampton6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCandace Kautzky vs Kecia Coleman1-6, 0-6
2024-11-05vs Tomlinson/NC SnowdenLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Larkin vs Amasa Lacy3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLacey Dunlap vs Celeste Wilson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-27vs McKimLost 12
W#1 SinglesJennifer Pacileo vs Michelle McKim6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesLacey Dunlap vs WENDY Vines6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesCandace Kautzky vs Maggie Neal4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jennifer Pacileo
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Morgan Pippen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Candace Kautzky
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.60
Lacey Dunlap
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Amy Arnell
published 3
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Dunlap + Jennifer Pacileo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Pacileo
13W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Morgan Pippen
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
2.5
Candace Kautzky
13W–10L career · type S · 5 lines in 2024
0%20%80%
2.62
Lacey Dunlap
26W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%24%76%
2.60
3
Amy Arnell
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.45
Jennifer Larkin
7W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.