Teams

Rodgers- Singles Oxford 18+

2024 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-07vs Touchstone - NC/SnowdenWon 20
W#1 SinglesVicki Lindsay vs Carie Costello6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLindsay Banks vs Marin Touchstone4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-26vs Arnell SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Morgan Pippen6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesFelicia Powell vs Jennifer Larkin6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesKathlene Poulelis vs Jennifer Pacileo6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-11-19vs McKimWon 30
W#1 SinglesMarley Gant vs Michelle McKim6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFelicia Powell vs Maggie Neal6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLindsay Banks vs Kimberly Tarsi6-1, 6-3
2024-11-03vs Tomlinson/NC SnowdenWon 21
W#1 SinglesBailey Rodgers vs Brandi Tomlinson6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesVicki Lindsay vs Kimberly Williams6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKathlene Poulelis vs Marti Montgomery6-7, 4-6
2024-10-29vs Black - NC - CC OxfordLost 03
L#1 SinglesAllyson Chapin vs Priscilla Hawkins3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLindsay Banks vs Blakeney Black1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesIvey Bruntlett vs Hallie Beasley2-6, 2-6
2024-10-28vs Garner 18+ NCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMarley Gant vs Emily Green4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVicki Lindsay vs Kecia Coleman3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesFelicia Powell vs Pam Johnson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jessica Flesch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Felicia Powell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Bailey Rodgers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Vicki Lindsay
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Kathlene Poulelis
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Allyson Chapin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.44
Lindsay Banks
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.39
Marley Gant
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ivey Bruntlett
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Lindsay + Kathlene Poulelis4255% games+13.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Flesch
28W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Felicia Powell
34W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.02
3
Bailey Rodgers
17W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Vicki Lindsay
37W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.88
Kathlene Poulelis
37W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%3%97%
2.77
3
Allyson Chapin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Banks
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%67%33%
2.44
Marley Gant
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%78%22%
2.39
Ivey Bruntlett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.