Teams

Tomlinson/NC Snowden

2024 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08vs Black - NC - CC OxfordLost 03
L#1 SinglesAmasa Lacy vs Mary Kate Whelan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCeleste Wilson vs Heather McDonald0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMarti Montgomery vs Hillary Welton1-6, 4-6
2024-11-20vs Touchstone - NC/SnowdenSplit 11
L#2 SinglesRoni Terry vs MacKenzie Fowler4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJami Feinberg vs Salena White6-3, 6-3
2024-11-15vs Garner 18+ NCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmasa Lacy vs Devra Hampton6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCeleste Wilson vs Houstyn Loosier3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesShea Young vs Pam Johnson6-1, 7-6
2024-11-05vs Arnell SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmasa Lacy vs Jennifer Larkin6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCeleste Wilson vs Lacey Dunlap4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBrandi Tomlinson vs Emily Williams6-1, 6-0
2024-11-03vs Rodgers- Singles Oxford 18+Split 11
L#1 SinglesBrandi Tomlinson vs Bailey Rodgers2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMarti Montgomery vs Kathlene Poulelis7-6, 6-4
2024-10-28vs McKimWon 30
W#1 SinglesShea Young vs Kimberly Tarsi6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRoni Terry vs Ashleigh Parker6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJami Feinberg vs Brittany Brooks7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Shea Young
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
2.85
Amasa Lacy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Brandi Tomlinson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.62
Marti Montgomery
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Celeste Wilson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.55
Jami Feinberg
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Roni Terry
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roni Terry + Shea Young5165% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shea Young
62W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.08
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brandi Tomlinson
23W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Marti Montgomery
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%20%80%
2.62
3
Celeste Wilson
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jami Feinberg
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Roni Terry
35W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%51%49%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.