Teams

Sports Mall-Henderson/Walljasper

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

18 players · average NTRP 3.72 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-31vs Spanish Fork-Jensen/WinkelSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTatum Santiago / Lexie Williams vs Marilyn Patch / Raquel Moss6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanelle Horton / Hailee Horton vs Elizabeth West / Sue Ellen Vincent3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-Cooper/StaceyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTatum Santiago / Lexie Williams vs Kelly LaFrance / Kristen Treanor6-3, 6-2
2022-05-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesTatum Santiago / Lexie Williams vs JaNean Nelson / Rebecca Schwartz6-1, 6-4
2022-05-10vs Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/AnnunziataSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLexie Williams / Tatum Santiago vs Jessica Schulz / Melissa Despain3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanelle Horton / Hailee Horton vs Michelle Cutler / Robin Simmons1-6, 1-6
2022-05-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesLexie Williams / Tatum Santiago vs Carolyn Cottle / Jan Watts6-1, 6-1
2022-04-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesHailee Horton / Janelle Horton vs Lynley Hogan / Michelle Weddington7-6, 6-3
2022-04-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargaret Smedley / Tatum Santiago vs Carrie Larsen / Maryam Klock7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesHailee Horton / Mae Alexander vs Emily Benton / Alena Taylor6-4, 6-2
2022-04-18vs Liberty Park Tennis-CarruthersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanelle Horton / Hailee Horton vs Shelly Kemp / Ann Trentman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLexie Williams / Tatum Santiago vs Sharon Larkin / Summer Borla6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Martha Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.87
Mae Alexander
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Esther Hatch
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Singles 15% · published 4
3.69
Aurie Colligan
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.59
Jennifer Sampson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.58
DeeAnn Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.33
Debra Knowlton
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.32
Janelle Horton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.29
Dena Porter
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.27
Traci Wood
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Hailee Horton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Yoko Walljasper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Inga Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Stacy Criddle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lexie Williams
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Margaret Smedley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shauna Lake
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Tatum Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lexie Williams + Tatum Santiago6074% games+19.7% vs expected
Aurie Colligan + Martha Brown7267% games+10.6% vs expected
Jennifer Sampson + Inga Nelson6172% games+8.8% vs expected
Esther Hatch + Yoko Walljasper5161% games+8.2% vs expected
Inga Nelson + Yoko Walljasper12261% games+7.2% vs expected
DeeAnn Henderson + Martha Brown12463% games+6.8% vs expected
Jennifer Sampson + Stacy Criddle3357% games+5.3% vs expected
Inga Nelson + DeeAnn Henderson3253% games+4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Brown
202W–72L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
Mae Alexander
59W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
4
Esther Hatch
137W–58L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Aurie Colligan
156W–49L career · 10 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jennifer Sampson
208W–140L career · 9 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
DeeAnn Henderson
291W–224L career · 9 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Debra Knowlton
169W–137L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Janelle Horton
58W–50L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dena Porter
51W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Traci Wood
37W–18L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Hailee Horton
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Yoko Walljasper
308W–196L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 12 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Stacy Criddle
154W–122L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Lexie Williams
20W–3L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Smedley
40W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shauna Lake
135W–130L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tatum Santiago
11W–3L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.