Teams

Bjorn's Borgs

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-15vs Racqueteers 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesChristopher Banks vs Leonardo Balieiro6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPoulam Saha vs Rudolph Isaac6-2, 6-1
2026-08-08vs 3.5 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 SinglesPoulam Saha vs Lwazi Rennert6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesSteven Park vs Bennett Stackhouse2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDylan Park vs Jose Santacana6-1, 6-3
2026-08-02vs District, Set, MatchWon 30
W#1 SinglesPoulam Saha vs Andreas Storz6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDylan Park vs Peter Trahan6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Pablo Gardea6-2, 6-1
2026-07-26vs BreakersWon 21
L#1 SinglesPoulam Saha vs Justin Romano2-6, 6-5
W#2 SinglesChristopher Banks vs John Sluder6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDylan Park vs Michael Wasser6-2, 5-4
2026-07-19vs DC Rally ChampsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesPoulam Saha vs Brandon Zink6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Jack Turman4-6, 5-3
2026-07-05vs AceMongersWon 21
L#1 SinglesSamuel Fontanez vs Justin Jocewicz0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSteven Park vs Ronnie Greene6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDylan Park vs Adnan Karimi7-5, 3-2
2026-06-27vs Chip N ChargeWon 20
W#1 SinglesDylan Park vs Orlando Delgado6-2, 3-4
W#2 SinglesChristopher Banks vs Ayoub Sarouphim6-2, 6-1
2026-06-20vs DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)Won 21
L#1 SinglesSteven Park vs Eric Paisner3-6, 3-2
W#2 SinglesChristopher Banks vs David Sigman4-6, 4-1
W#3 SinglesDylan Park vs Mitchell Miller7-5, 3-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DC Rally Champs0714713142
2DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)0716516153
3Chip N Charge0712917156
43.5 Terminetters07101120165
5AceMongers07101124187
6District, Set, Match0721937219
7Bjorn's Borgs0816814158
8Racqueteers 3.50861836239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Christopher Banks
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Dylan Park
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.31
Steven Park
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.31
Samuel Fontanez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Poulam Saha
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Banks + Steven Park6079% games+23.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Banks
55W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Dylan Park
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Steven Park
57W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Samuel Fontanez
71W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Poulam Saha
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.