Teams

3.5 Terminetters

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-08vs Bjorn's BorgsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLwazi Rennert vs Poulam Saha1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Steven Park6-2, 6-2
2026-08-02vs DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Jeffrey Marks6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs David Sigman3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesScott Whittaker vs Charles Davant6-0, 6-3
2026-07-19vs Racqueteers 3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesLwazi Rennert vs Taurean Branch6-3, 4-4
W#2 SinglesIan Ma vs Rudolph Isaac6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesScott Whittaker vs Daniel Volker6-2, 6-3
2026-07-18vs DC Rally ChampsLost 01
L#2 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs Jack Turman6-7, 0-2
2026-07-11Split 11
W#1 SinglesSeung Wan Paik vs Marc Gottschalk6-3, 4-1
L#2 SinglesNeeraj Gupta vs Zachary King4-6, 1-3
2026-06-27vs BreakersLost 12
L#1 SinglesSeung Wan Paik vs Justin Romano2-6, 4-5
L#2 SinglesIan Ma vs Peter Gwynn-Sackson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Michael Wasser6-3, 6-5
2026-06-21vs AceMongersWon 21
L#1 SinglesBennett Stackhouse vs Justin Jocewicz3-6, 4-3
W#2 SinglesLwazi Rennert vs Ronnie Greene6-0, 7-5
W#3 SinglesScott Whittaker vs Adnan Karimi6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DC Rally Champs0714713142
2DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)0716516153
3Chip N Charge0712917156
43.5 Terminetters07101120165
5AceMongers07101124187
6District, Set, Match0721937219
7Bjorn's Borgs0816814158
8Racqueteers 3.50861836239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Bennett Stackhouse
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Scott Whittaker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Seung Wan Paik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.38
Ian Ma
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Lwazi Rennert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.07
Neeraj Gupta
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Desmond LaMar
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bennett Stackhouse
23W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Scott Whittaker
30W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Seung Wan Paik
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Ian Ma
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Lwazi Rennert
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Neeraj Gupta
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.