Teams

Breakers

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-15vs DC Rally ChampsLost 12
W#1 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Jack Turman6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Wasser vs Ebenezer Omojola2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJustin Romano vs Will Fischer6-7, 0-5
2026-08-09vs AceMongersLost 12
L#1 SinglesJohn Sluder vs Justin Jocewicz2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Wasser vs Rafael Luz2-6, 5-5
W#3 SinglesMalcolm Magee vs Adnan Karimi6-1, 6-4
2026-07-26vs Bjorn's BorgsLost 12
W#1 SinglesJustin Romano vs Poulam Saha6-2, 5-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Sluder vs Christopher Banks3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMichael Wasser vs Dylan Park2-6, 4-5
2026-07-25vs Chip N ChargeWon 21
L#1 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Nicholas Isaac Bamman6-7, 0-4
W#2 SinglesMichael Wasser vs Fabrizio Cariani6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMalcolm Magee vs Ayoub Sarouphim6-3, 1-2
2026-07-12vs DC Tennis Club (3.5 men)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJohn Sluder vs Eric Paisner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMalcolm Magee vs David Sigman4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Wasser vs Charles Davant5-7, 2-2
2026-07-05vs District, Set, MatchWon 30
W#1 SinglesJohn Sluder vs Andreas Storz6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Elias Ghorayeb6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMalcolm Magee vs Pablo Gardea6-4, 6-0
2026-06-27vs 3.5 TerminettersWon 21
W#1 SinglesJustin Romano vs Seung Wan Paik6-2, 5-4
W#2 SinglesPeter Gwynn-Sackson vs Ian Ma6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMichael Wasser vs Bennett Stackhouse3-6, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Breakers04751297
2DJ Kitten057814118
3We're Tennis Friends0822244274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Peter Gwynn-Sackson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Justin Romano
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
John Sluder
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.30
Eric Wachter
published 3.5
3.24
Michael Wasser
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Malcolm Magee
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Romano + Eric Wachter2356% gamesnot enough data
Peter Gwynn-Sackson + Justin Romano224 matchesnot enough data
John Sluder + Eric Wachter224 matchesnot enough data
Peter Gwynn-Sackson + Eric Wachter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Peter Gwynn-Sackson
35W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Justin Romano
91W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
John Sluder
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Eric Wachter
52W–59L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Michael Wasser
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Malcolm Magee
58W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.