Teams

IE-VMHS-Susan Boland

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-12vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Jeananne Woodman vs Whitney Johnson / Theresa Winterburn4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-12vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertWon 10
W#1 SinglesRisa Chung vs Holly Greywood6-1, 6-1
2022-04-30vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Shadid / Katie Dienhart vs Trish Newlin / Sheila Purdy6-1, 6-4
2022-04-24vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 20
W#1 DoublesElvia Quintana / Katherine Shadid vs Amanda Will / Judy Henning6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRisa Chung vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-16vs IE-LLW-CL-Dana BoyanLost 01
L#2 SinglesRisa Chung vs Holly Birdsell6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Risa Chung
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.85
Elvia Quintana
published 4
3.85
Katherine Shadid
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Ronda Smyth
published 4
3.74
Lori Swingle
published 4
3.65
3.53
Kathy Valdez
published
3.28
Laura Acosta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elvia Quintana + Lori Swingle271260% games+4.7% vs expected
Elvia Quintana + Risa Chung12260% games+4.2% vs expected
Lori Swingle + Ronda Smyth8160% games+3.9% vs expected
Susan Campbell-Boland + Lori Swingle123 matchesnot enough data
Elvia Quintana + Ronda Smyth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Risa Chung
157W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
Elvia Quintana
179W–106L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Ronda Smyth
64W–56L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Lori Swingle
76W–54L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Susan Campbell-Boland
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kathy Valdez
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Laura Acosta
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.