Teams

IE-TCC-Ellen Yarter

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-26vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Allison Smith vs Kathleen Shaffer / Nicole Hollowell7-5, 6-4
2022-06-25vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Shannon Sapp vs Whitney Johnson / Theresa Winterburn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-18vs IE-LLW-CL-Dana BoyanLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Sheila Purdy vs Becky Gagnon / Rhianna Thompson3-6, 1-6
2022-05-29vs IE-LLW-CL-Dana BoyanLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrish Newlin / Allison Smith vs Jennifer Kries / Martina Masarani1-6, 3-6
2022-05-21vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertLost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Yarter / Trish Newlin vs Dana Olague / Cristina Hamlin1-6, 2-6
2022-04-30vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandLost 01
L#2 DoublesTrish Newlin / Sheila Purdy vs Katherine Shadid / Katie Dienhart1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Shannon Sapp
published
3.85
Silvia Vich
published
3.64
Diana Kirkland
published 4
3.59
Trish Newlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Sheila Purdy
published
3.27
Ellen Yarter
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.23
Shaheen Plunier
published
3.14
Kerri Munson
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Laurel Eriksen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Munson + Ellen Yarter6454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Sapp
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.93
Silvia Vich
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Diana Kirkland
47W–102L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Trish Newlin
55W–112L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Sheila Purdy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Ellen Yarter
82W–127L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Shaheen Plunier
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Kerri Munson
129W–137L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Laurel Eriksen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.