Teams

IE-LLW-CL-Dana Boyan

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.91 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-18vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Gagnon / Rhianna Thompson vs Trish Newlin / Sheila Purdy6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDana Boyan vs Diana Kirkland6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCHARLOTTE DEHESA / Kristen Kennedy vs Allison Smith / Ellen Yarter6-3, 6-1
2022-06-12vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 30
W#1 DoublesMartina Masarani / Rosemary Mireles vs Kathleen Shaffer / Nicole Hollowell6-0, 7-6
W#2 SinglesCHARLOTTE DEHESA vs Mary Ann Neder6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDana Boyan / Becky Gagnon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-04vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRosemary Mireles / Martina Masarani vs Amy Growsky / Marites Killion4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDana Boyan vs Holly Greywood6-2, 6-1
2022-05-29vs IE-TCC-Ellen YarterSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDana Boyan / Melissa Connor vs Jennifer Miller / Shaheen Plunier6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Lessley / Becky Gagnon vs Ellen Yarter / Kerri Munson6-2, 6-4
2022-05-15vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMartina Masarani / Rosemary Mireles vs Elvia Quintana / Lori Swingle4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCHARLOTTE DEHESA vs Geraldine Rojas6-0, 6-0
2022-05-07vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterWon 30
W#1 DoublesCHARLOTTE DEHESA / Jennifer Kries vs Rebecca Cloyd / Nicole Hollowell7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Boyan / Kristy Toups vs Joan Greene / Mary Ann Neder6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRhianna Thompson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01vs IE-CCCC-Sharon HebertWon 20
W#1 DoublesMartina Masarani / Rosemary Mireles vs Kathalena Cocker / Theresa Winterburn6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCHARLOTTE DEHESA vs Amy Markham6-1, 6-4
2022-04-16vs IE-VMHS-Susan BolandWon 10
W#1 SinglesDana Boyan vs Laura Acosta6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Dana Boyan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Julie Lessley
published 4
3.78
Keiko Dodge
published 4
3.78
Becky Ness
published 4
3.76
Rosemary Mireles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Rhianna Thompson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.73
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Martina Masarani
published
3.71
Lucy Vogliardo
published 4
3.60
Jennifer Kries
published 4
3.34
Becky Gagnon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Holly Birdsell
published 3.5
Melissa Connor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhianna Thompson + Julie Lessley9654% games+5.5% vs expected
Becky Ness + Julie Lessley5255% games+2.6% vs expected
Lucy Vogliardo + Keiko Dodge16858% games+2.5% vs expected
Rosemary Mireles + Rhianna Thompson382950% games+0.1% vs expected
Rosemary Mireles + CHARLOTTE DEHESA61049% gamesnot enough data
CHARLOTTE DEHESA + Jennifer Kries2353% gamesnot enough data
CHARLOTTE DEHESA + Julie Lessley2350% gamesnot enough data
Rosemary Mireles + Dana Boyan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Boyan
177W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Julie Lessley
95W–64L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Keiko Dodge
34W–25L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Becky Ness
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Rosemary Mireles
119W–97L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Rhianna Thompson
137W–91L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
145W–114L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Martina Masarani
17W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lucy Vogliardo
40W–27L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jennifer Kries
102W–95L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Becky Gagnon
61W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Holly Birdsell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06
Melissa Connor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.