Teams

Straughn2022

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Tri-Level · 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-05vs MJCramerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLindsey Petrick / Camryn Straughn vs Wurth Drummond / Elisabeth Van Order6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Metelo / Emily Hallam vs Kari Knoblauch / Kathryn Shields0-6, 2-6
2022-08-02vs ICWaychoffWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Camryn Straughn vs Christine Waychoff / Amanda Campbell6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesValerie Clowes / Keshia Green vs Grace Poole / Elizabeth Rupert4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-28vs KLamb TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Camryn Straughn vs Louise Hutchinson / Jessie Brinkley6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeshia Green / Michelle Metelo vs Gabrielle Bohdel / Cassie Pence0-6, 0-6
2022-07-16vs ICWaychoffLost 01
L#3 DoublesValerie Clowes / Cheri Kivisto vs Grace Poole / Elizabeth Rupert2-6, 4-6
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Camryn Straughn vs Susan Wilkerson / Beth Robertson6-1, 6-1
2022-06-30vs MJCramerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Camryn Straughn vs Wurth Drummond / Elisabeth Van Order7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Metelo / Valerie Clowes vs Cayt Kirkman / Morgan Sheets1-6, 0-6
2022-06-23vs KLamb TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCamryn Straughn / Lindsey Petrick vs Louise Hutchinson / Jo Ann Novak6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCheri Kivisto / Michelle Metelo vs Cassie Pence / Gabrielle Bohdel3-6, 1-6
2022-06-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Camryn Straughn vs Julie Lee / Susan Wilkerson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-02vs JSolomonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Camryn Straughn vs Kathy Anderson / Sharon McCloud7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesValerie Clowes / Cheri Kivisto vs Lea Edmondson / Christy van Ness5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Camryn Straughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Keshia Green
published
3.43
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.29
Elizabeth Marriott
published 3.5
3.03
Cheri Kivisto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Michelle Metelo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.13
Valerie Clowes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Straughn
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camryn Straughn
47W–26L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Keshia Green
41W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
27W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Elizabeth Marriott
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Cheri Kivisto
92W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Michelle Metelo
62W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Valerie Clowes
64W–134L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jennifer Straughn
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.