Teams

CDTA S 18&OW3.0 e.TF Oak Park Fasano Thurs 6:30 $24

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

17 players · average NTRP 3.12 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMarissa Fasano / Shannon Wasiolek vs Ginny Lazarus / ELIZABETH BULF1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Mirel vs Monika Thadhani0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTina Lamkey / Susan Veazie vs Svetlana Vinokur / Amanda Ripp3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesVanessa Druckman / Marissa Fasano vs Katie Marchewka / Jan James-Calvert3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Griffin / Doris Huang vs Susan Walsh / Chrissy Scott6-7, 0-5
L#3 DoublesKristen Carey / Melissa Lutz vs MARY GALLAGHER / Julie Biehl2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Veazie vs Gretchen Athas0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Mirel vs Nicole Koleno0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDoris Huang / Christine Tran vs Samantha Garrity / Jamie Rauscher4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBrianne Kellogg / Suzanne Griffin vs Sarah W Johnson / Lisa Charpentier6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Fleisch vs Jeanne Tromp3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesShannon Wasiolek / Kate Ulrich vs Yan Gao / Kimberly Pfahl1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Mirel vs Beatrisa Paz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDawn van Hee / Doris Huang vs Aubrey Ellis / Kay Noonan5-7, 1-3
L#1 DoublesSusan Veazie / Shannon Wasiolek vs Elizabeth Lucy Buckley / Pamela Jackson5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiana Mirel / Doris Huang vs Patti Tzoubris / Stacey Watson4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Carey vs Margaret Peterburs7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Avalos vs Selma Bouhl2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Minges Wols / Ashley Reed vs Leila Goldberg / Krista Hogarth6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Mirel / Rebecca Becker vs Julianne Hartzell / Susan Schierl Sullivan1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW3.0 i.Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 6 $2080291128285
2CDTA S 18&OW3.0 f.Centennial Lam Mon 7 $2062301025240
3CDTA S 18&OW3.0 c.MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2553251538317
4CDTA S 18&OW3.0 b.MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2853221841308
5CDTA S 18&OW3.0 h.MT Pal Watson Wed 7 $2544182245352
6CDTA S 18&OW3.0 d.Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2035172347352
7CDTA S 18&OW3.0 a.MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2835182248340
8CDTA S 18&OW3.0 e.TF Oak Park Fasano Thurs 6:30 $2426162453362
9CDTA S 18&OW3.0 g.Centennial Steinbrueck Sun 5 $200853573444

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brianne Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Shannon Wasiolek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Vanessa Druckman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Suzanne Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Diana Mirel
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Doris Huang
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Dawn van Hee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Minges Wols
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Fleisch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kate Ulrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Avalos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kristen Carey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Marissa Fasano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Becker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Veazie
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Tina Lamkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Druckman + Marissa Fasano134 matchesnot enough data
Marissa Fasano + Shannon Wasiolek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexandra Pascuzzi
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brianne Kellogg
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Wasiolek
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.16
Vanessa Druckman
20W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Suzanne Griffin
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
2.5
Diana Mirel
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Doris Huang
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Dawn van Hee
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Heather Minges Wols
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Julie Fleisch
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kate Ulrich
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Katie Avalos
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kristen Carey
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marissa Fasano
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Becker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Susan Veazie
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Lamkey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.