Teams

CDTA S 18&OW3.0 f.Centennial Lam Mon 7 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMeg Hui / Michelle Yeh vs Julie Gordon / Jody Sternberg7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKerrie Crawford / Mary Kaczmarek vs Andrea Best / Kristina Kallianis6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Sarah W Johnson vs Julianne Hartzell / Jamie Brady6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin McCarthy / Simone Brown vs Leila Goldberg / Dina DeLaurentis4-6, 4-3, 0-1
2023-07-10Won 20
W#1 SinglesDenise Lam vs Sheri Levine7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSandra Paterakos / Kelly Gruner vs Judy Dluzen / DEBORAH LEMONIDIS6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Kaczmarek / Kelly Gruner vs Allison Cohen / Katherine Cassou6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRenee Lanam vs Leena Bhat6-2, 5-2
W#1 DoublesSarah W Johnson / Lisa Charpentier vs Brianne Kellogg / Suzanne Griffin4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Yeh / Kristen Denicolo vs Kimberly Barry / Vicki Johnson2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDenise Lam vs Ashley Dempsey6-4, 5-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Charpentier / Sarah W Johnson vs Cynthia Rowe / Susan Walsh6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKerrie Crawford / Mary Kaczmarek vs Chrissy Scott / Jan James-Calvert6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Ryan / Michelle Yeh vs Amanda Baker / Prabha Parameswaran6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRenee Lanam vs Helen Lee6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Charpentier / Sarah W Johnson vs Nour Rishmawy / Karen Accattato6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesElizabeth David / Kristen Denicolo vs Vanessa Rosengarden / Jenna Stanley1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Lanam vs Gretchen Athas3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMary Kaczmarek / Erin McCarthy vs Nancy Fitzgerald / Amanda Marijanovic6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW3.0 i.Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 6 $2080291128285
2CDTA S 18&OW3.0 f.Centennial Lam Mon 7 $2062301025240
3CDTA S 18&OW3.0 c.MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2553251538317
4CDTA S 18&OW3.0 b.MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2853221841308
5CDTA S 18&OW3.0 h.MT Pal Watson Wed 7 $2544182245352
6CDTA S 18&OW3.0 d.Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2035172347352
7CDTA S 18&OW3.0 a.MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2835182248340
8CDTA S 18&OW3.0 e.TF Oak Park Fasano Thurs 6:30 $2426162453362
9CDTA S 18&OW3.0 g.Centennial Steinbrueck Sun 5 $200853573444

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Denise Lam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.26
Christi Harrison
published 3.5
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Sarah W Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Elizabeth David
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Meg Hui
published 3
2.89
Simone Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Lisa Charpentier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Erin McCarthy
published 3
2.54
Mary Kaczmarek
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Kerrie Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Renee Lanam
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kelly Gruner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Denicolo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Paterakos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Rapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Harrison + Michelle Yeh3453% games+7.8% vs expected
Christi Harrison + Jeanne Tromp3548% games+6.2% vs expected
Lisa Charpentier + Simone Brown4351% games−1.9% vs expected
Renee Lanam + Jeanne Tromp3348% games−8.2% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Jeanne Tromp5260% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kaczmarek + Simone Brown2351% gamesnot enough data
Christi Harrison + Simone Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Yeh + Lisa Charpentier314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Lam
320W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christi Harrison
54W–48L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
Sarah W Johnson
91W–135L career · 5 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Elizabeth David
67W–48L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Meg Hui
71W–58L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
Simone Brown
44W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
Lisa Charpentier
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Erin McCarthy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Kaczmarek
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
Kerrie Crawford
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Renee Lanam
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.45
Kelly Gruner
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristen Denicolo
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Paterakos
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Rapp
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.