← Search

Elizabeth David

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Evanston, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 74W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-10-17 · CHI E 55W7.0 8.Her Lamey Sat 2 $26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Midge Mountin
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-11 · CHI F CW6.5 2.RT Cox Sun 2 $29 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martha Billen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · CHI E 40W3.5 2.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gia DeCicco
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · CHI E 18W3.5 16.Tam Freund Sun 3 $25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Konwal
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 5.Tam Freund Wed 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Wolf
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Toft
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 5.Tam Freund Wed 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Wolf
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · CDTA S 40&OW3.5 6.Tam Kanev Sun 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Wittman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · CDTA W ComboW6.5 2.Gnvw Tromp Sat 5 $21 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Kasiurak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-2
L
2026-04-18 · CDTA W 18&OW3.5 16.Tam Freund Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Leavitt
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · CDTA W 18&OW3.5 16.Tam Freund Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Mital
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · CDTA W 18&OW3.5 16.Tam Freund Sat 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Hui
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 51% of games
3.5
56.3%
40W–31L · 49.7% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 62% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova