Teams

CDTA S 18&OW3.0 g.Centennial Steinbrueck Sun 5 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMargaret Peterburs / Amanda Baker vs Kimberly Barry / Kathryn Lentz6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKafi Chase / Karen Accattato vs Anjana Dalal / Ashley Dempsey2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKarin Steinbrueck vs Nicole Koleno2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNour Rishmawy / Sara Ellis vs Amanda Marijanovic / Jude Sharp3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Schade / Allie McRaith vs Jody Sternberg / Irene Okada2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara Ellis / Nour Rishmawy vs Pam Cohen / Julie Gordon1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Driscoll / Karin Steinbrueck vs Amy Shappert / Kay Noonan4-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMargaret Peterburs vs Sarah Jamieson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllie McRaith / Karin Steinbrueck vs Jamie Burns / Rachel Fuller0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNour Rishmawy / Karen Accattato vs Leila Goldberg / Mariana Ingersoll1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSara Ellis / Karin Steinbrueck vs Stephanie Rapp / Jeanne Tromp0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAllie McRaith vs Christi Harrison0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNour Rishmawy / Karen Accattato vs Lisa Charpentier / Sarah W Johnson1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMargaret Peterburs vs Kristen Carey6-7, 6-7
L#1 DoublesMargaret Peterburs / Tammy Brody vs Ginny Lazarus / ELIZABETH BULF4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKarin Steinbrueck vs Svetlana Vinokur2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Duke / Helen Lee vs Nancy Dolan / Amanda Ripp3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSara Ellis vs Laurie Woolverton4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Duke vs Sheri Levine5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Peterburs / Sara Ellis vs Cherrie Han / DEBORAH LEMONIDIS6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTammy Brody vs Sharon Snyder0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Lee / Karen Accattato vs Miriam Wozniewski / Judy Dluzen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW3.0 i.Lake Bluff Sherman Sun 6 $2080291128285
2CDTA S 18&OW3.0 f.Centennial Lam Mon 7 $2062301025240
3CDTA S 18&OW3.0 c.MT Bann Gordon Sun 2 $2553251538317
4CDTA S 18&OW3.0 b.MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $2853221841308
5CDTA S 18&OW3.0 h.MT Pal Watson Wed 7 $2544182245352
6CDTA S 18&OW3.0 d.Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $2035172347352
7CDTA S 18&OW3.0 a.MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $2835182248340
8CDTA S 18&OW3.0 e.TF Oak Park Fasano Thurs 6:30 $2426162453362
9CDTA S 18&OW3.0 g.Centennial Steinbrueck Sun 5 $200853573444

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allie McRaith
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Carolyn Driscoll
published 3
2.52
2.50
Karin Steinbrueck
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.44
Elizabeth Duke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.40
Karen Accattato
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Sara Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.24
Kafi Chase
published 2.5
Jennifer Schade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Peterburs
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Nour Rishmawy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Brody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Duke + Prabha Parameswaran41039% games+5.5% vs expected
Kafi Chase + Karen Accattato11527% games+0.1% vs expected
Kafi Chase + Sara Ellis0927% games−4.1% vs expected
Prabha Parameswaran + Kafi Chase4941% games−5.0% vs expected
Prabha Parameswaran + Karin Steinbrueck41736% games−7.0% vs expected
Kafi Chase + Nour Rishmawy0516% gamesnot enough data
Karin Steinbrueck + Sara Ellis1428% gamesnot enough data
Prabha Parameswaran + Karen Accattato044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allie McRaith
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carolyn Driscoll
1W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Prabha Parameswaran
36W–74L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Karin Steinbrueck
14W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.50
3
Elizabeth Duke
10W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44
Karen Accattato
5W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.40
Sara Ellis
4W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.34
2.5
Kafi Chase
11W–66L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.24
Jennifer Schade
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Peterburs
11W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nour Rishmawy
2W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Brody
0W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.