Teams

Brown K 4.0 55 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-24vs Manning 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Hedgecock / Shawn McFarlin vs Betsey Wells / Missy Chance6-3, 6-2
2023-04-03vs Dunbar 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Minerva Loran vs Leah Price / Julia Barnes4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-03-21vs Manning 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Hedgecock / Shawn McFarlin vs Margaret Reynolds / Betsey Wells6-4, 6-3
2023-03-06vs McKenzie-Callaghan 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Hedgecock / Shawn McFarlin vs Ginger Hayworth / Ronette Duhe6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Mimi Cartee
published
3.74
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.73
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.71
Pam McAmis
published
3.68
Ann Evans
published 4
3.61
Carolyn Pellerin
published 4
3.55
Lisa Andree
published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.54
Mary Batts
published
3.40
Kathy Hedgecock
published
3.31
Kathy Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukari Matsuoka + Carolyn Pellerin5063% games+2.6% vs expected
Shawn McFarlin + Catherine Tanner3547% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Mimi Cartee
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Catherine Tanner
40W–39L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Pam McAmis
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Ann Evans
22W–17L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carolyn Pellerin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Lisa Andree
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Mary Batts
30W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.54
Kathy Hedgecock
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Kathy Brown
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.