Teams

Manning 4.0 55 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-24vs Brown K 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobyn Manning / Margaret Reynolds vs Marisa Sharer / Mary Batts0-6, 0-6
2023-04-15vs Dunbar 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Robyn Manning vs Cindy Lynk / Jane Bunemann6-4, 6-3
2023-04-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobyn Manning / Margaret Joseph vs Jean Eagan / Marie-Lyne Lavoie2-6, 1-6
2023-03-27vs McKenzie-Callaghan 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Robyn Manning vs Dell Barbee / Marsha Tice7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-13vs Glenn 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobyn Manning / Mary Jane Tarver vs Kim Hunt / Stacey Dennehy4-6, 2-6
2023-03-06vs Dunbar 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Robyn Manning vs Linda Lowman / Cindy Lynk6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mary Jane Tarver
published
3.44
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.35
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.29
Margaret Joseph
published
3.25
Judy Eaton
published
3.25
Robyn Manning
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Betsey Wells
published 3.5
2.97
Jill Elam
published
2.92
Elizabeth Deterding
published
2.89
Missy Chance
published
Marianne Millikan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Manning + Margaret Joseph5259% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Tarver
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kathryn Michaud
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Margaret Reynolds
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Margaret Joseph
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Judy Eaton
38W–21L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Robyn Manning
139W–69L career · 12 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Betsey Wells
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Jill Elam
19W–30L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Elizabeth Deterding
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.92
Missy Chance
13W–31L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.89
Marianne Millikan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.