Teams

McKenzie-Callaghan 4.0 55 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-24vs Eagan/McElreath 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaula Tedford / Ginger Hayworth vs Jean Eagan / Gwenda Priest1-6, 1-6
2023-04-17vs Glenn 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Callaghan / Ginger Hayworth vs Tracey Weeks / Sue Blanchard6-3, 6-3
2023-04-15vs Brown K 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesGinger Hayworth / Floy Collis vs Marisa Sharer / Catherine Tanner3-6, 2-6
2023-04-10vs Dunbar 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarsha Tice / Ginger Hayworth vs Kari Craig / Julianne Shamburg1-6, 6-7
2023-04-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPamela Aikens / Ginger Hayworth vs Mary Beth Ebert / Kelly Miller6-7, 3-6
2023-03-06vs Brown K 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesGinger Hayworth / Ronette Duhe vs Kathy Hedgecock / Shawn McFarlin4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Dell Barbee
published 4
3.37
Marsha Tice
published
3.25
Susan Calkins
published
Ginger Hayworth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Pamela Aikens
published
3.23
Floy Collis
published 3.5
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
published 3.5
3.15
Amy Callaghan
published 3.5
3.15
Ronette Duhe
published
3.02
Gina Kinard
published 3.5
2.79
Brenda MacFadden
published 3
Julie Brennan
published
Paula Tedford
published
Sherri Nichols Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Callaghan + Jaime Hendricks134 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Aikens + Jaime Hendricks123 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Hendricks + Gina Kinard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Marsha Tice
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Susan Calkins
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ginger Hayworth
88W–42L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Aikens
19W–36L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Floy Collis
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jaime Hendricks
13W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Callaghan
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Ronette Duhe
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Gina Kinard
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Brenda MacFadden
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Julie Brennan
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Tedford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Nichols Hill
0W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.