Teams

Glenn 4.0 55 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Kim Hunt vs Saundra Westervelt / Kelly Miller2-6, 2-6
2023-04-15vs Eagan/McElreath 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Stacey Dennehy vs Lynn Jacoby / Suzanne Rudy2-6, 4-6
2023-04-10vs Brown K 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesGracie Womack / Kim Hunt vs Kathy Pace / Pam McAmis3-6, 3-6
2023-03-13vs Manning 4.0 55 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Stacey Dennehy vs Robyn Manning / Mary Jane Tarver6-4, 6-2
2023-03-06vs Eagan/McElreath 4.0 55 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Gracie Womack vs Suzanne Rudy / Lynn Jacoby2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Kim Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.41
Gracie Womack
published
3.25
Lora Farlow
published
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
3.22
Michele Shigo
published
3.21
Tracey Weeks
published
3.17
Sue Blanchard
published
3.17
Robin Crosier
published
3.10
Hayes Mills
published
2.98
Lorri Stephenson
published
2.92
Rhonda Glenn
published
Lisa Cook
published
Lisa Liringis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Crosier + Michele Shigo123 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Glenn + Sue Blanchard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Hunt
222W–160L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Gracie Womack
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Lora Farlow
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
Michele Shigo
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Tracey Weeks
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Sue Blanchard
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Robin Crosier
17W–31L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Hayes Mills
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lorri Stephenson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
Rhonda Glenn
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lisa Cook
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Liringis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.