Teams

X40 7.0 MV3 Zhang

2025 NEOTA Mixed 40 & Over · NEOTA 7.0 40&O Mixed

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-11vs NEO/Ung/X40/7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKrishna Neelakanta / Erica Wigton vs Andrew Albrecht / Rebecca Drenovsky3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCyrus Bazljoo / Michelle Scullin vs Vu Nguyen / Kathleen Aranavage3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBin Zhao / Lisa Bockhoff vs Gary Fleming / Patricia Mercuri2-6, 6-7
2025-03-07vs NEO/Ung/X40/7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCyrus Bazljoo / Susan Lenahan vs Phong Nguyen / Donna Fleming2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlexios Marountas / Lisa Bockhoff vs David Blond / Marybeth Esposito2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJaneen Miklowski / Bin Zhao vs Vu Nguyen / Kathleen Aranavage4-6, 1-6
2025-02-21vs X40 7.0 MV1 SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesCyrus Bazljoo / Chipo Jolibois vs John Olenik / Marian Lauer6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan White / Michelle Scullin vs Rita Gilman / Ki Mixon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesXiaojuan Li / Wei Liao vs Lauren Smith / Brad Gerber2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs X40 7.0 MV1 SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesLishan Zhang / Alexios Marountas vs Marian Lauer / Mehul Shah3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChipo Jolibois / Nicholas Fasola vs Rita Gilman / Richard Kozich7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBob Berichon / Lisa Bockhoff vs Lauren Smith / Suber Huang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA 7.0 40&O Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO/Ung/X40/7.0712138149
2X40 7.0 MV3 Zhang53141030238
3X40 7.0 MV1 Smith53121230240
4X40 7.0 NC Paulino2671736249
5X40 7.0 BR Timken1761839255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Erica Wigton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Yuri Borsch
published
3.32
Lisa Bockhoff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Bob Berichon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Janeen Miklowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Cyrus Bazljoo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Alexios Marountas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Chipo Jolibois
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Nicholas Fasola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Lishan Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Krishna Neelakanta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Wei Liao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Maxine Miller
published
3.01
Susan Lenahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Michelle Scullin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Xiaojuan Li
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Bin Zhao
published 3
Ryan White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chipo Jolibois + Nicholas Fasola134 matchesnot enough data
Cyrus Bazljoo + Chipo Jolibois213 matchesnot enough data
Chipo Jolibois + Bob Berichon213 matchesnot enough data
Yuri Borsch + Lishan Zhang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Wigton
43W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Yuri Borsch
107W–81L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Lisa Bockhoff
30W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bob Berichon
85W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Janeen Miklowski
75W–90L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Cyrus Bazljoo
66W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alexios Marountas
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Chipo Jolibois
83W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Nicholas Fasola
96W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Lishan Zhang
115W–84L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Krishna Neelakanta
32W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Wei Liao
67W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Maxine Miller
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Susan Lenahan
44W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Michelle Scullin
43W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Xiaojuan Li
25W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Bin Zhao
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan White
25W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.