Teams

Brad Jost M6.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · M 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-24vs Eugene Yeoh M6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTravis Lea / David Romness vs Daniel Jean / Jimmy Tu3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJacob Davenport / Paul Snitker vs Ryan Wirtz / Marc Tatarsky6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBobby Rosener / Doug Hipskind vs Kyle Richard / James Carroll-Linden3-6, 3-6
2025-08-23vs Greg Puklicz M6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJacob Davenport / Doug Hipskind vs Mike Dunlap / Joe Johnson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBobby Rosener / Paul Snitker vs Matt Brendel / Alec Hollis6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrad Jost / John Hansmann vs Tad Deupree / Eliot Kerlin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-23vs Bao Hoang M6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJacob Davenport / Paul Snitker vs Peter Cappello / Thuan Tran6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTravis Lea / David Romness vs Nathan Belshaw / Avinash Potala3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBobby Rosener / MICHAEL ERDMANN vs ROBERT BELL / Andres Bedoya6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Bobby Rosener
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Daniel Pronovost
published 3.5
3.32
Travis Lea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Doug Hipskind
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
David Romness
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
Brad Jost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Paul Snitker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
MICHAEL ERDMANN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
John Hansmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacob Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Snitker + David Romness8067% games+11.9% vs expected
David Romness + Doug Hipskind5255% gamesnot enough data
John Hansmann + David Romness3351% gamesnot enough data
Brad Jost + John Hansmann134 matchesnot enough data
David Romness + Travis Lea123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bobby Rosener
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Daniel Pronovost
26W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Travis Lea
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Doug Hipskind
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
David Romness
30W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
3.5
Brad Jost
2W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Paul Snitker
17W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
MICHAEL ERDMANN
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
John Hansmann
24W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Jacob Davenport
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.