Teams

Greg Puklicz M6.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · M 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-24vs Bao Hoang M6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesMike Dunlap / Joe Johnson vs Nathan Belshaw / Avinash Potala6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Brendel / Alec Hollis vs Peter Cappello / Thuan Tran6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGreg Puklicz / Anirudh Reddy vs Andres Bedoya / ROBERT BELL3-6, 4-6
2025-08-23vs Brad Jost M6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Dunlap / Joe Johnson vs Jacob Davenport / Doug Hipskind6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Brendel / Alec Hollis vs Bobby Rosener / Paul Snitker0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTad Deupree / Eliot Kerlin vs Brad Jost / John Hansmann3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-23vs Eugene Yeoh M6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMike Dunlap / Joe Johnson vs James Carroll-Linden / Ryan Wirtz6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatt Brendel / Alec Hollis vs Marc Tatarsky / Kevin Luong6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Anirudh Reddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Matt Brendel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Alec Hollis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Mike Dunlap
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Eliot Kerlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Andrew Nevin
published 3
2.94
Tad Deupree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Greg Puklicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alec Hollis + Matt Brendel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anirudh Reddy
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Matt Brendel
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Alec Hollis
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Mike Dunlap
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Eliot Kerlin
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Andrew Nevin
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Tad Deupree
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Greg Puklicz
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.