Teams

Eugene Yeoh M6.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · M 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-24vs Brad Jost M6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Jean / Jimmy Tu vs Travis Lea / David Romness6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRyan Wirtz / Marc Tatarsky vs Jacob Davenport / Paul Snitker3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKyle Richard / James Carroll-Linden vs Bobby Rosener / Doug Hipskind6-3, 6-3
2025-08-23vs Bao Hoang M6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesMarc Tatarsky / Davis Huynh vs Peter Cappello / Thuan Tran6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJames Carroll-Linden / Ryan Wirtz vs Nathan Belshaw / Avinash Potala6-2, 4-1
W#3 DoublesJimmy Tu / Kevin Luong vs Andres Bedoya / ROBERT BELL6-4, 6-2
2025-08-23vs Greg Puklicz M6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Carroll-Linden / Ryan Wirtz vs Mike Dunlap / Joe Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarc Tatarsky / Kevin Luong vs Matt Brendel / Alec Hollis2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for M 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Daniel Jean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Ryan Wirtz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Davis Huynh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Jimmy Tu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Marc Tatarsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Eugene Yeoh
published
James Carroll-Linden
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kyle Richard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kyle Richard + Ryan Wirtz404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Jean
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Ryan Wirtz
23W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Davis Huynh
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jimmy Tu
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Marc Tatarsky
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Eugene Yeoh
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Carroll-Linden
20W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Richard
33W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.