Teams

Burns/Lindenberg 55s 3.5W Fri AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-02vs McNeill 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesL Moore / Susan Stahl vs Nancy McNeill / Patty Dutton2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Causey / Betty Smith vs Cindy McElreath / Marianne Millikan5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Tyler / Deborah Young vs Elizabeth Deterding / Anne Thornton3-6, 3-6
2025-04-18vs JOSEPH 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuisa Cobos / Ila Rosenthal vs Ann Zuraw / Terri Hendrickson1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKim Tyler / Deborah Young vs Kelly Pryzwansky / Beth Loseke4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Causey / Andrea Bushnell vs Catherine Joseph / Dixie Culver1-6, 1-6
2025-04-11vs Varner/Davis 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Causey / Andrea Bushnell vs Jamie Stoffel / Teresa Cruz1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Burns / Betty Smith vs Amy Dulin / Suzanne Perez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesIla Rosenthal / Kathy Baldwin vs Donna Davis / Patty Garner5-2
2025-04-04vs Berreth/Herron 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Wallace / Kathy Baldwin vs Krisla Berreth / Patty Craig0-6, 2-6
2025-03-28vs Gossage 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Causey / Ila Rosenthal vs Betsy Clapp / Brenda MacFadden3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBetty Smith / Melanie Burns vs Michelle Harris / Karen Brady-Siler7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Tyler / Shannon Hughes vs Anne Benda / Sherri Nichols Hill6-3, 6-3
2025-03-21vs Kramer 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Causey / Kathy Baldwin vs Debbie Thomas / Maria Pincus3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIla Rosenthal / Andrea Bushnell vs Debbie Burgess / Christine Osteen1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Lupton / Luisa Cobos vs Ann PORTER / Robin Smith1-6, 4-6
2025-03-14vs Fogleman 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesIla Rosenthal / Susan Causey vs Cheryl Scott / Kimberly Franz0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Burns / Betty Smith vs Grace Titzer / Lora Farlow7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLuisa Cobos / Kim Tyler vs Mary Jane Tarver / Marsha Tice5-7, 0-6
2025-03-07vs Womack 55s 3.5W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Lupton / Susan Stahl vs Jennifer Dymek / Donna Warrick1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIla Rosenthal / Susan Causey vs Judy Thomas / Julia Barnes4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKathy Baldwin / Andrea Bushnell vs Stacey Dennehy / Robin Crosier2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Melanie Burns
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Deborah Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Laura Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Susan Causey
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Betty Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Ila Rosenthal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Shannon Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Luisa Cobos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Barbara Lupton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Kathy Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Mechelle Lindenberg
published
2.57
Andrea Bushnell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
L Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betty Smith + Melanie Burns033 matchesnot enough data
Ila Rosenthal + Susan Causey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Deborah Young
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Laura Wallace
47W–73L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Susan Causey
2W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Betty Smith
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Shannon Hughes
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Luisa Cobos
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Barbara Lupton
2W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Kathy Baldwin
1W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.76
Mechelle Lindenberg
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Andrea Bushnell
1W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
L Moore
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Stahl
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.