Teams

Womack 55s 3.5W Fri AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-19vs Gossage 55s 3.5W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Thomas / Stacey Harris vs Betsy Clapp / Anne Benda6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Warrick / Jennifer Dymek vs Michelle Harris / Pam Ferrell6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Annie Chapman vs Patricia Barman / Brenda MacFadden6-2, 6-2
2025-03-07vs Burns/Lindenberg 55s 3.5W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Dymek / Donna Warrick vs Barbara Lupton / Susan Stahl6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Thomas / Julia Barnes vs Ila Rosenthal / Susan Causey6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Robin Crosier vs Kathy Baldwin / Andrea Bushnell6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Annie Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Julia Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Gracie Womack
published 3.5
3.28
Stacey Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Judy Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Donna Warrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Tracey Weeks
published
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Jennifer Dymek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Robin Crosier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kelli Young
published
3.07
Patti Morgan
published
Lisa Cook
published
Lisa Liringis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Dymek + Donna Warrick5357% games+11.7% vs expected
Judy Thomas + Annie Chapman6253% games+5.8% vs expected
Tracey Weeks + Kelli Young4256% games−5.1% vs expected
Julia Barnes + Annie Chapman303 matchesnot enough data
Judy Thomas + Stacey Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annie Chapman
19W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Julia Barnes
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Gracie Womack
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Stacey Harris
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
Judy Thomas
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Donna Warrick
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Tracey Weeks
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Jennifer Dymek
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Robin Crosier
18W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kelli Young
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Patti Morgan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lisa Cook
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Liringis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.